Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38613002›Full record

ReviewNutrients2024

Variability in Definitions and Criteria of Extrauterine Growth Restriction and Its Association with Neurodevelopmental Outcomes in Preterm Infants: A Narrative Review.

Clara González-López, Gonzalo Solís-Sánchez, Sonia Lareu-Vidal, Laura Mantecón-Fernández, Aleida Ibáñez-Fernández, Ana Rubio-Granda, Marta Suárez-Rodríguez

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nutrients, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. [Associations between growth retardation and perinatal factors in preterm infants].Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Incidence and factors associated with bronchopulmonary dysplasia: a cohort study in a high-risk Colombian neonatal intensive care unit.Revista paulista de pediatria : orgao oficial da Sociedade de Pediatria de Sao Paulo · 2026
    Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Clara González-LópezUnidad de Neonatología, Área de Gestión Clínica de Pediatría, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, 33011 Oviedo, Spain.
Gonzalo Solís-SánchezUnidad de Neonatología, Área de Gestión Clínica de Pediatría, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, 33011 Oviedo, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-0363-831X
Sonia Lareu-VidalUnidad de Neonatología, Área de Gestión Clínica de Pediatría, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, 33011 Oviedo, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-9692-6526
Laura Mantecón-FernándezUnidad de Neonatología, Área de Gestión Clínica de Pediatría, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, 33011 Oviedo, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-6770-8263
Aleida Ibáñez-FernándezUnidad de Neonatología, Área de Gestión Clínica de Pediatría, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, 33011 Oviedo, Spain.
Ana Rubio-GrandaUnidad de Neonatología, Área de Gestión Clínica de Pediatría, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, 33011 Oviedo, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-6443-9085
Marta Suárez-RodríguezUnidad de Neonatología, Área de Gestión Clínica de Pediatría, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, 33011 Oviedo, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-5682-9083

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Extrauterine growth restriction (EUGR) has been used in the literature and clinical practice to describe inadequate growth in preterm infants. Significant variability is seen in the criteria for EUGR, with no standard definition reached to date. Moreover, no consensus on the optimal timing for assessment or the ideal growth monitoring tool has been achieved, and an ongoing debate persists on the appropriate terminology to express poor postnatal growth. To ensure an adequate understanding of growth and early intervention in preterm infants at higher risk, it is critical to relate the diagnostic criteria of EUGR to the ability to predict adverse outcomes, such as neurodevelopmental outcomes. This narrative review was conducted to present evidence that evaluates neurodevelopmental outcomes in preterm infants with EUGR, comparing separately the different definitions of this concept by weight (cross-sectional, longitudinal and "true" EUGR). In this article, we highlight the challenges of comparing various published studies on the subject, even when subclassifying by the definition of EUGR, due to the significant variability on the criteria used for each definition and for the evaluation of neurodevelopmental outcomes in different papers. This heterogeneity compromises the obtention of a single firm conclusion on the relation between different definitions of EUGR and adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes.

Indexed as

Early Intervention, EducationalInfant, PrematureConsensusCross-Sectional StudiesHumansInfantInfant, Newbornextrauterine growth restrictionneurodevelopmentprematurity

Identifiers

PMID38613002
PMCPMC11013404

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.