Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38613337›Full record

ArticleTrends in hearing

Attention Mobilization as a Modulator of Listening Effort: Evidence From Pupillometry.

M A Johns, R C Calloway, I M D Karunathilake, L P Decruy, S Anderson, J Z Simon, S E Kuchinsky

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Trends in hearing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Listening effort measurement by pupillometry under dual-task paradigms: the effect of auditory spectral resolution.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

M A JohnsInstitute for Systems Research, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1868-8141
R C CallowayInstitute for Systems Research, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA.
I M D KarunathilakeDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA.
L P DecruyInstitute for Systems Research, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA.
S AndersonDepartment of Hearing and Speech Sciences, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0731-4574
J Z SimonInstitute for Systems Research, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA.
S E KuchinskyDepartment of Hearing and Speech Sciences, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA.
University of Maryland, College Park · USWalter Reed National Military Medical Center · US

Funding

Speech Perception with High Cognitive DemandP01AG055365 · NIA · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI GORDON-SALANT, SANDRA M · 2017 to 2021
$8.4M
COMPARATIVE AND EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY OF HEARINGT32DC000046 · NIDCD · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI Catherine Emily Carr, Matthew J. Goupell · 1994 to 2026
$7.5M
Linkage/Positional Cloning In Communication DisordersZ01DC000046 · NIDCD · NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON DEAFNESS AND OTHER COMMUNICATION DISORDERS · PI DRAYNA, DENNIS · 1998 to 2008
$3.3M
Multilevel Auditory Processing of Continuous Speech, from Acoustics to LanguageR01DC019394 · NIDCD · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI SIMON, JONATHAN Z. · 2021 to 2025
$2.9M
Intramural NIH HHS Z01 DC000046NIA NIH HHS P01 AG055365NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC019394NIDCD NIH HHS T32 DC000046
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Listening to speech in noise can require substantial mental effort, even among younger normal-hearing adults. The task-evoked pupil response (TEPR) has been shown to track the increased effort exerted to recognize words or sentences in increasing noise. However, few studies have examined the trajectory of listening effort across longer, more natural, stretches of speech, or the extent to which expectations about upcoming listening difficulty modulate the TEPR. Seventeen younger normal-hearing adults listened to 60-s-long audiobook passages, repeated three times in a row, at two different signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) while pupil size was recorded. There was a significant interaction between SNR, repetition, and baseline pupil size on sustained listening effort. At lower baseline pupil sizes, potentially reflecting lower attention mobilization, TEPRs were more sustained in the harder SNR condition, particularly when attention mobilization remained low by the third presentation. At intermediate baseline pupil sizes, differences between conditions were largely absent, suggesting these listeners had optimally mobilized their attention for both SNRs. Lastly, at higher baseline pupil sizes, potentially reflecting overmobilization of attention, the effect of SNR was initially reversed for the second and third presentations: participants initially appeared to disengage in the harder SNR condition, resulting in reduced TEPRs that recovered in the second half of the story. Together, these findings suggest that the unfolding of listening effort over time depends critically on the extent to which individuals have successfully mobilized their attention in anticipation of difficult listening conditions.

Indexed as

Listening EffortPupilAdultHumansSignal-To-Noise RatioSpeechanticipatory arousalbaseline pupil sizemental effortspeech in noisetask-evoked pupil response

Identifiers

PMID38613337
PMCPMC11015766
OpenAlexW4394784550

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.