Evidence mapPaperPMID 38615316Full record

SynthesisEuropean child & adolescent psychiatry2024

Is behavioural activation an effective treatment for depression in children and adolescents? An updated systematic review and meta-analysis.

Lucy Tindall, Philip Kerrigan, Jinshuo Li, Emily Hayward, Lina Gega

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European child & adolescent psychiatry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
6.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Altered reward-related resting-state network properties in adolescent cannabis use and depression.Progress in neuro-psychopharmacology & biological psychiatry · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lucy TindallDepartment of Health Sciences, University of York, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, UK. Lucy.tindall@york.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7486-5037
Philip KerriganDepartment of Health Sciences, University of York, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8319-8734
Jinshuo LiDepartment of Health Sciences, University of York, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1496-7450
Emily HaywardDepartment of Health Sciences, University of York, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2413-0104
Lina GegaHull York Medical School, University of York, Heslington, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2902-9256
University of York · GB

Funding

National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) - Programme Grants for Applied Research Programme NIHR201174
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Behavioural Activation (BA)-a brief therapy based on the scheduling of enjoyable, purposeful and rewarding activities-is an effective and cost-effective treatment for depression in adults that shows promise for children and adolescents. We provide an update on a previous systematic review of evidence on BA-delivered in-person, telephone, or online-for depression and comorbid anxiety in children and adolescents. We conducted systematic literature searches in 6 databases up to February 2024. We included all study designs evaluating BA with participants up to 18 years old with diagnosable depression, as established by a validated screening tool or diagnostic manual. We used the Moncrieff Scale and the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool to assess study quality. We summarised the findings of all study types with a narrative synthesis and of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) with a meta-analysis. Overall, 24 studies (6 RCTs, 18 pre-post evaluations, n = 2,758) met our inclusion criteria. A meta-analysis of 4 RCTs (n = 156) showed that BA has a small effect of 0.24 (Hedge's adjusted g) in reducing depression symptoms compared to a waiting-list control, usual care and other therapies. Online and telephone-facilitated BA was shown to be feasible in 3 studies and effective in 1. Outcomes on comorbid anxiety were mixed. No economic evaluations met our inclusion criteria. BA shows sufficient promise as an intervention for reducing depression symptoms in children and adolescents to justify the need for further RCTs, providing that five conditions are met: studies are powered to detect a minimal clinically important difference; BA materials are fit-for-purpose to produce clinically meaningful change; follow-ups are longer than 6 months; primary outcomes are child-reported; and intervention costs, resource use and adverse events are reported.

Indexed as

DepressionAdolescentBehavior TherapyChildDepressive DisorderHumansBehavioural activationDepressionDigital mental healthMood disordersPsychological therapySchool interventionsYoung people

Identifiers

PMID38615316
PMCPMC11618157
OpenAlexW4394793677

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.