Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38616069›Full record

SynthesisAdvances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.)2024

Local Food System Approaches to Address Food and Nutrition Security among Low-Income Populations: A Systematic Review.

Katharine Garrity, Kathleen Krzyzanowski Guerra, Hannah Hart, Khawlah Al-Muhanna, Emily C Kunkler, Ashlea Braun, Kathryn I Poppe, Kara Johnson, Emma Lazor, Yang Liu and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
32.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Screening of Pediatric Patients at Cardiology Clinic Identifies High Prevalence of Food Insecurity.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Benefits of Nutrition Education in Local Community Supported Agriculture Sites: A Case Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Katharine GarrityDivision of Medical Dietetics, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University.
Kathleen Krzyzanowski GuerraJohn Glenn College of Public Affairs, The Ohio State University.
Hannah HartCollege of Public Health, The Ohio State University.
Khawlah Al-MuhannaDivision of Medical Dietetics, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University.
Emily C KunklerDivision of Medical Dietetics, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University.
Ashlea BraunDepartment of Nutritional Sciences, College of Education and Human Sciences, Oklahoma State University.
Kathryn I PoppeCollege of Public Health, The Ohio State University.
Kara JohnsonDivision of Medical Dietetics, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University.
Emma LazorDivision of Medical Dietetics, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University.
Yang LiuDivision of Medical Dietetics, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University.
Jennifer A GarnerDivision of Medical Dietetics, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University; John Glenn College of Public Affairs, The Ohio State University. Electronic address: Jennifer.garner@osumc.edu.
The Ohio State University · USOklahoma State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Food and nutrition insecurity disproportionately impact low-income households in the United States, contributing to higher rates of chronic diseases among this population. Addressing this challenge is complex because of various factors affecting the availability and accessibility of nutritious food. Short value chain (SVC) models, informally known as local food systems, offer a systemic approach that aims to optimize resources and align values throughout and beyond the food supply chain. Although specific SVC interventions, such as farmers markets, have been studied individually, a comprehensive review of SVC models was pursued to evaluate their relative impact on food security, fruit and vegetable intake, diet quality, health-related markers, and barriers and facilitators to participation among low-income households. Our systematic literature search identified 37 articles representing 34 studies from 2000-2020. Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed-method studies revealed that farmers market interventions had been evaluated more extensively than other SVC models (i.e., produce prescription programs, community-supported agriculture, mobile markets, food hubs, farm stands, and farm-to-school). Fruit and vegetable intake was the most measured outcome; other outcomes were less explored or not measured at all. Qualitative insights highlighted common barriers to SVC use, such as lack of program awareness, limited accessibility, and cultural incongruence, whereas facilitators included health-promoting environments, community cohesion, financial incentives, and high-quality produce. Social marketing and dynamic nutrition education appeared to yield positive program outcomes. Financial incentives were used in many studies, warranting further investigation into optimal amounts across varying environmental contexts. SVC models are increasingly germane to national goals across the agriculture, social, and health care sectors. This review advances the understanding of key knowledge gaps related to their implementation and impact; it emphasizes the need for research to analyze SVC potential comprehensively across the rural-urban continuum and among diverse communities through long-term studies of measurable health impact and mixed-method studies investigating implementation best practices. This trial was registered at PROSPERO as CRD42020206532.

Indexed as

DietFood SecurityFood SupplyFruitPovertyVegetablesFood InsecurityHumansNutritional StatusUnited Statescommunity-supported agriculturefarmers marketsfarm standsfarm-to-schoolfood hubsfruits and vegetablesmobile marketsnutrition educationnutrition incentive programsproduce prescription programs

Identifiers

PMID38616069
PMCPMC11031423
OpenAlexW4392644935

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.