Trial reportJournal of atherosclerosis and thrombosis2024
Efficacy and Safety of Pemafibrate Extended-Release Tablet: a Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Active-Controlled, Parallel-Group Comparison Trial.
Trial report in Journal of atherosclerosis and thrombosis, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04714151 (A Phase III Confirmatory Study of K-877 Extended Release Tablet-A Multicenter, Active Controlled, Randomized, Double Blind, Parallel Group Controlled Trial in Patients With Dyslipidemia With High TG-), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase III Confirmatory Study of K-877 Extended Release Tablet-A Multicenter, Active Controlled, Randomized, Double Blind, Parallel Group Controlled Trial in Patients With Dyslipidemia With High TG-
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pemafibrate for hypertriglyceridemia: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials evaluating efficacy and safety outcomes.Systematic reviews · 2026Pooled it
- Long-Term Effects of Extended-Release Pemafibrate Tablets on Dyslipidemia and Safety in Triglyceridemic Patients: A Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized, Open-Label, Parallel-Group Study.Journal of atherosclerosis and thrombosis · 2025Trial
- Clinical Pharmacology of Pemafibrate Extended-release Formulation in Patients with Hypertriglyceridemia-A Phase 2, Multicenter, Active-controlled, Randomized, Single-blind, Crossover study.Journal of atherosclerosis and thrombosis · 2025Trial
- From Nuclear Receptor Regulation to Spleen Activating and Accumulation Resolving Therapy: A Review of Traditional Chinese Medicine Against Diabetes and Inflammation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Disproportionality analysis of biliary adverse events associated with fibrates using the JADER and FAERS databases.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
- Once-daily Extended-Release Pemafibrate Enhances Adherence and Triglyceride Control Over Twice-Daily Dosing.Journal of atherosclerosis and thrombosis · 2024Article
- Impact of Conversion from Conventional Pemafibrate to Novel Pemafibrate XR on Hypertriglyceridemia: An Observational Retrospective Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsPemafibrate, a selective peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor α modulator that lowers serum triglyceride levels and increases high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels, is approved for treating dyslipidemia as twice-daily immediate-release (IR) tablets. A once-daily extended-release (XR) tablet has also been developed. We aimed to confirm the non-inferiority of XR (0.2 or 0.4 mg/day; once daily) to IR (0.2 mg/day; twice daily) in lowering triglyceride levels in patients with hypertriglyceridemia.
methodsThis phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-blind study included patients with fasting triglycerides ≥ 200 mg/dL who received IR (0.2 mg/day) or XR (0.2 or 0.4 mg/day). The primary efficacy endpoint was the percentage change in fasting triglyceride levels from baseline to 4, 8, and 12 weeks. Common treatment effects at weeks 4 through 12 were compared between groups using repeated analysis of covariance.
resultsIn 356 randomized patients, fasting triglyceride levels decreased by 48.0%, 43.8%, and 48.0% with IR 0.2, XR 0.2, and XR 0.4 mg/day, respectively, confirming the non-inferiority of both XR regimens to IR. The proportion of patients who achieved fasting triglycerides <150 mg/dL was 45.7%, 37.4%, and 51.7%, while the percentage change of triglycerides in the subgroup with baseline triglycerides ≥ 500 mg/dL was -59.3%, -52.2%, and -66.3% with IR 0.2, XR 0.2, and XR 0.4 mg/day, respectively.
conclusionsXR (0.2 and 0.4 mg/day) was non-inferior to IR (0.2 mg/day). XR 0.4 mg/day demonstrated a more potent triglyceride-lowering effect than XR 0.2 mg/day and should be considered for patients with high triglyceride levels.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.