Evidence mapPaperPMID 38616679Full record

ReviewJournal of dental research2024

Strategies for Improving Impaired Osseointegration in Compromised Animal Models.

J Deng, C Van Duyn, D J Cohen, Z Schwartz, B D Boyan

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of dental research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

J DengDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, College of Engineering, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA.
C Van DuynDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, College of Engineering, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA.
D J CohenDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, College of Engineering, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA.
Z SchwartzDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, College of Engineering, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1212-6164
B D BoyanDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, College of Engineering, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9642-0311
Virginia Commonwealth University · USGeorgia Institute of Technology · USThe University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio · US

Funding

Mechanisms Mediating Osseointegration of 3D Printed Titanium ConstructsR01AR072500 · NIAMS · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI BOYAN, BARBARA D. · 2019 to 2023
$2.9M
VCU National Coordinating Center for Advancing Gender Inclusive ExcellenceU24DK138889 · NIDDK · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI BOYAN, BARBARA D., KORNSTEIN, SUSAN G. · 2024 to 2024
$521k
NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR072500NIDDK NIH HHS U24 DK138889
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Implant osseointegration is reduced in patients with systemic conditions that compromise bone quality, such as osteoporosis, disuse syndrome, and type 2 diabetes. Studies using rodent models designed to mimic these compromised conditions demonstrated reduced bone-to-implant contact (BIC) or a decline in bone mineral density. These adverse effects are a consequence of disrupted intercellular communication. A variety of approaches have been developed to compensate for the altered microenvironment inherent in compromised conditions, including the use of biologics and implant surface modification. Chemical and physical modification of surface properties at the microscale, mesoscale, and nanoscale levels to closely resemble the surface topography of osteoclast resorption pits found in bone has proven to be a highly effective strategy for improving implant osseointegration. The addition of hydrophilicity to the surface further enhances osteoblast response at the bone-implant interface. These surface modifications, applied either alone or in combination, improve osseointegration by increasing proliferation and osteoblastic differentiation of osteoprogenitor cells and enhancing angiogenesis while modulating osteoclast activity to achieve net new bone formation, although the specific effects vary with surface treatment. In addition to direct effects on surface-attached cells, the communication between bone marrow stromal cells and immunomodulatory cells is sensitive to these surface properties. This article reports on the advances in titanium surface modifications, alone and in combination with novel therapeutics in animal models of human disease affecting bone quality. It offers clinically translatable perspectives for clinicians to consider when using different surface modification strategies to improve long-term implant performance in compromised patients. This review supports the use of surface modifications, bioactive coatings, and localized therapeutics as pragmatic approaches to improve BIC and enhance osteogenic activity from both structural and molecular standpoints.

Indexed as

Bone-Implant InterfaceDental ImplantsDisease Models, AnimalOsseointegrationSurface PropertiesAnimalsDental Implantation, EndosseousHumansOsteoblastsOsteoclastsOsteogenesisDental Implantsbone diseasesbone-implant interfacebone regenerationdiabetes mellitusmetabolicosteoporosissurface propertiestype 2

Identifiers

PMID38616679
PMCPMC11055505
OpenAlexW4394820026

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.