Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38617710›Full record

ReviewJournal of circadian rhythms2024

Timely Questions Emerging in Chronobiology: The Circadian Clock Keeps on Ticking.

Sangeeta Chawla, John O'Neill, Marina I Knight, Yuqing He, Lei Wang, Erik Maronde, Sergio Gil Rodríguez, Gerben van Ooijen, Eduardo Garbarino-Pico, Eva Wolf and 13 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of circadian rhythms, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Rhythmic Dynamics of Stress Granules inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors.

Sangeeta ChawlaDepartment of Biology, University of York, York YO105DD, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4077-736X
John O'NeillMRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology Cambridge, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2204-6096
Marina I KnightDepartment of Mathematics, University of York, York YO105DD, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9926-6092
Yuqing HeKey Laboratory of Plant Molecular Physiology, CAS Center for Excellence in Molecular Plant Sciences, China National Botanical Garden, Beijing 100093, CN.
Lei WangKey Laboratory of Plant Molecular Physiology, CAS Center for Excellence in Molecular Plant Sciences, China National Botanical Garden, Beijing 100093, CN.
Erik MarondeInstitut für Anatomie II, Dr. Senckenbergische Anatomie, Goethe-Universität Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern-Kai-7, 60590 Frankfurt, DE.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5574-6323
Sergio Gil RodríguezSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Max Born Crescent, Edinburgh EH9 3BF, UK.
Gerben van OoijenSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Max Born Crescent, Edinburgh EH9 3BF, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7967-0637
Eduardo Garbarino-PicoUniversidad Nacional de Córdoba (UNC), Facultad de Ciencias Químicas, Departamento de Química Biológica Ranwel Caputto, Córdoba, AR.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2931-2038
Eva WolfInstitute of Molecular Physiology (IMP), Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Hanns-Dieter-Hüsch- Weg 17, 55128 Mainz, DE.
Ouria Dkhissi-BenyahyaInserm, Stem Cell and Brain Research Institute U1208, Univ Lyon, UniversitéClaude Bernard Lyon 1, 18 Avenue du Doyen Lépine, 69500, Bron, FR.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9168-3801
Anjoom NikhatSimons Centre for the Study of Living Machines, National Centre for Biological Sciences, Bangalore, Karnataka 560065, IN.
Shaon ChakrabartiSimons Centre for the Study of Living Machines, National Centre for Biological Sciences, Bangalore, Karnataka 560065, IN.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7429-5927
Shawn D YoungstedtEdson College of Nursing and Health Innovation, Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ, US.
Natalie Zi-Ching MakDepartment of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, US.
Ignacio ProvencioDepartment of Biology and Department of Ophthalmology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, US.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1175-920X
Henrik OsterInstitute of Neurobiology, Center for Brain, Behavior & Metabolism (CBBM), University of Luebeck, 23562 Luebeck, DE.
Namni GoelBiological Rhythms Research Laboratory, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, US.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2602-1996
Mario CabaCentro de Investigaciones Biomédicas, Universidad Veracruzana, Xalapa, Ver., MX.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7475-3441
Maria OosthuizenDepartment of Zoology and Entomology, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, ZA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6305-8283
Giles E DuffieldDepartment of Biological Sciences, Galvin Life Science Center, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, US.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1373-7805
Christopher ChabotDepartment of Biological Sciences, Plymouth State University, Plymouth, NH 03264, US.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8686-7665
Seth J DavisDepartment of Biology, University of York, York YO105DD, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5928-9046

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chronobiology investigations have revealed much about cellular and physiological clockworks but we are far from having a complete mechanistic understanding of the physiological and ecological implications. Here we present some unresolved questions in circadian biology research as posed by the editorial staff and guest contributors to the Journal of Circadian Rhythms. This collection of ideas is not meant to be comprehensive but does reveal the breadth of our observations on emerging trends in chronobiology and circadian biology. It is amazing what could be achieved with various expected innovations in technologies, techniques, and mathematical tools that are being developed. We fully expect strengthening mechanistic work will be linked to health care and environmental understandings of circadian function. Now that most clock genes are known, linking these to physiological, metabolic, and developmental traits requires investigations from the single molecule to the terrestrial ecological scales. Real answers are expected for these questions over the next decade. Where are the circadian clocks at a cellular level? How are clocks coupled cellularly to generate organism level outcomes? How do communities of circadian organisms rhythmically interact with each other? In what way does the natural genetic variation in populations sculpt community behaviors? How will methods development for circadian research be used in disparate academic and commercial endeavors? These and other questions make it a very exciting time to be working as a chronobiologist.

Indexed as

AlgaeAllelic variationChronotherapyCircadianCircadian alignmentCircalunarCircatidalCrop plantsEntrainmentFood-entrainable oscillatorImagingImmunityLiquid-liquid phase separationMelatoninModelingMosquito bitingphenotypesPhotoperiodRedoxRetinaSeasonal migrationSleepStructural biologySynchronyUrbanisation

Identifiers

PMID38617710
PMCPMC11011957

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.