Trial reportThe Journal of dermatology2024
Validation of the Index for Facial Angiofibromas: Data analysis from a randomized controlled trial of sirolimus gel treatment in patients with tuberous sclerosis complex.
Trial report in The Journal of dermatology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02635789 (A Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo-controlled Phase III Trial to Investigate the Efficacy and Safety of NPC-12G Gel), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo-controlled Phase III Trial to Investigate the Efficacy and Safety of NPC-12G Gel (Topical Formulation of Sirolimus) to Angiofibroma and Other Skin Lesions in Patients With Tuberous Sclerosis Complex
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Validation of the Index for Facial Angiofibromas: Data analysis from a randomized controlled trial of sirolimus gel treatment in patients with tuberous sclerosis complex.The Journal of dermatology · 2024Trial
- Japanese intractable and rare dermatologic diseases: From the official skin-centered nanbyo core to an illustrative mechanism-based framework.Intractable & rare diseases research · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Index for Facial Angiofibromas (IFA), a novel scoring system for angiofibromas, has been validated in patients with tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC). The objective of this analysis was to further validate the IFA using data from a clinical trial of topical sirolimus in patients with TSC. This was an analysis of photographs from a Phase III trial conducted in Japan (NCT02635789). Patients (n = 62) were randomized 1:1 to receive sirolimus or placebo gel for 12 weeks. Changes in angiofibromas were independently assessed using the primary composite endpoint, the Facial Angiofibroma Severity Index (FASI), and the IFA. Thresholds for a clinically meaningful change in IFA score were evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. The IFA scores had good-to-excellent inter-assessor reliability, very high intra-assessor reliability, and could be used to evaluate the distribution of disease severity at baseline. High correlations were observed between the categorized change from baseline in IFA scores and the primary composite endpoint (Kendall's coefficient of concordance, W = 0.8655, p < 0.0001), and between the change from baseline in IFA and FASI scores (Kendall's coefficient of concordance, W = 0.745, p < 0.0001). By ROC analysis, an optimal IFA cut-off point of 1.667 was determined to distinguish patients with markedly improved or improved angiofibromas from those with slightly improved or unchanged angiofibromas (area under the curve 0.937) as determined by the primary composite endpoint. The IFA score is potentially clinically useful because of its high validity and reliability. A decrease in score from baseline of ≥1.667 may be considered clinically meaningful.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.