Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38623165›Full record

ReviewPhysiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology2024

Breeding rice for yield improvement through CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing method: current technologies and examples.

Balakrishnan Rengasamy, Mrinalini Manna, Nargis Begum Thajuddin, Muthukrishnan Sathiyabama, Alok Krishna Sinha

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Physiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Integrating physiological and multi-omics methods to elucidate heat stress tolerance for sustainable rice production.Physiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Balakrishnan RengasamyDepartment of Botany, Bharathidasan University, Tiruchirappalli, Tamil Nadu 620024 India.
Mrinalini MannaNational Institute of Plant Genome Research, Aruna Asaf Ali Marg, New Delhi, 110067 India.
Nargis Begum ThajuddinP. G. and Research Department of Biotechnology, Jamal Mohamed College, Affiliated to Bharathidasan University, Tiruchirappalli, Tamil Nadu 620024 India.
Muthukrishnan SathiyabamaDepartment of Botany, Bharathidasan University, Tiruchirappalli, Tamil Nadu 620024 India.
Alok Krishna SinhaNational Institute of Plant Genome Research, Aruna Asaf Ali Marg, New Delhi, 110067 India.ORCID 0000-0003-0820-9936
Bharathidasan University · INNational Institute of Plant Genome Research · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The impending climate change is threatening the rice productivity of the Asian subcontinent as instances of crop failures due to adverse abiotic and biotic stress factors are becoming common occurrences. CRISPR-Cas9 mediated genome editing offers a potential solution for improving rice yield as well as its stress adaptation. This technology allows modification of plant's genetic elements and is not dependent on foreign DNA/gene insertion for incorporating a particular trait. In this review, we have discussed various CRISPR-Cas9 mediated genome editing tools for gene knockout, gene knock-in, simultaneously disrupting multiple genes by multiplexing, base editing and prime editing the genes. The review here also presents how these genome editing technologies have been employed to improve rice productivity by directly targeting the yield related genes or by indirectly manipulating various abiotic and biotic stress responsive genes. Lately, many countries treat genome-edited crops as non-GMOs because of the absence of foreign DNA in the final product. Thus, genome edited rice plants with improved yield attributes and stress resilience are expected to be accepted by the public and solve food crisis of a major portion of the globe. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12298-024-01423-y.

Indexed as

CRISPR-Cas9Double stranded breakgRNAHomology directed repairNon-homologous end joiningRice yieldSite-directed-nucleases

Identifiers

PMID38623165
PMCPMC11016042
OpenAlexW4392594706

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.