Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38626194›Full record

ArticlePLoS biology2024

How do bacterial endosymbionts work with so few genes?

John P McCutcheon, Arkadiy I Garber, Noah Spencer, Jessica M Warren

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
12.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. EMS Mutation and SNP Detection in IntracellularbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Comprehensive Analysis of the Fourteen Complete Genome Sequences ofJournal of microbiology and biotechnology · 2024
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

John P McCutcheonBiodesign Institute and School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-5489-6039
Arkadiy I GarberBiodesign Institute and School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, United States of America.
Noah SpencerBiodesign Institute and School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, United States of America.
Jessica M WarrenBiodesign Institute and School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, United States of America.
Arizona State University · USHoward Hughes Medical Institute · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The move from a free-living environment to a long-term residence inside a host eukaryotic cell has profound effects on bacterial function. While endosymbioses are found in many eukaryotes, from protists to plants to animals, the bacteria that form these host-beneficial relationships are even more diverse. Endosymbiont genomes can become radically smaller than their free-living relatives, and their few remaining genes show extreme compositional biases. The details of how these reduced and divergent gene sets work, and how they interact with their host cell, remain mysterious. This Unsolved Mystery reviews how genome reduction alters endosymbiont biology and highlights a "tipping point" where the loss of the ability to build a cell envelope coincides with a marked erosion of translation-related genes.

Indexed as

BacteriaEukaryotaAnimalsBacterial Physiological PhenomenaGenome, BacterialPhylogenySymbiosis

Identifiers

PMID38626194
PMCPMC11020763
OpenAlexW4394857002

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.