Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38627287›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2024

Outcome of bleomycin electrosclerotherapy of slow-flow malformations in adults and children.

Vanessa F Schmidt, Özlem Cangir, Lutz Meyer, Constantin Goldann, Susanne Hengst, Richard Brill, Susanne von der Heydt, Milton Waner, Daniel Puhr-Westerheide, Osman Öcal and 10 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Vanessa F SchmidtDepartment of Radiology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, München, Germany. Vanessa.Schmidt@med.uni-muenchen.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7067-2203
Özlem CangirDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, Center for Vascular Malformations, Klinikum Barnim GmbH, Werner Forssmann Hospital, Eberswalde, Germany.
Lutz MeyerDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, Center for Vascular Malformations, Klinikum Barnim GmbH, Werner Forssmann Hospital, Eberswalde, Germany.
Constantin GoldannClinic and Policlinic of Radiology, Martin-Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany.
Susanne HengstDepartment of Radiology, Center for Vascular Malformations, Klinikum Barnim GmbH, Werner Forssmann Hospital, Eberswalde, Germany.
Richard BrillClinic and Policlinic of Radiology, Martin-Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany.
Susanne von der HeydtClinic and Policlinic of Radiology, Martin-Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany.
Milton WanerVascular Birthmark Institute of New York, New York, NY, USA.
Daniel Puhr-WesterheideDepartment of Radiology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, München, Germany.
Osman ÖcalDepartment of Radiology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, München, Germany.
Muzaffer Reha ÜmütlüDepartment of Radiology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, München, Germany.
Nabeel MansourDepartment of Radiology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, München, Germany.
Jan RudolphDepartment of Radiology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, München, Germany.
Alena SintDepartment of Radiology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, München, Germany.
Florian ObereisenbuchnerDepartment of Radiology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, München, Germany.
Beate HäberleInterdisziplinäres Zentrum für Gefäßanomalien (IZGA), LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, München, Germany.
Jens RickeDepartment of Radiology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, München, Germany.
Max SeidenstickerDepartment of Radiology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, München, Germany.
Walter A WohlgemuthClinic and Policlinic of Radiology, Martin-Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany.
Moritz WildgruberDepartment of Radiology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, München, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo evaluate the safety and clinical outcome of bleomycin electrosclerotherapy (BEST) for treating extracranial slow-flow malformations.

methodsIn this retrospective investigation of a multicenter cohort presenting symptomatic slow-flow malformations, patient records were analyzed with respect to procedural details and complications. A treatment-specific, patient-reported questionnaire was additionally evaluated, obtained 3-12 months after the last treatment, to assess the subjective outcomes, including mobility, aesthetic aspects, and pain, as well as the occurrence of postprocedural skin hyperpigmentation. All outcome parameters were compared according to patients' age.

resultsOverall, 325 BEST treatments were performed in 233 patients after intralesional and/or intravenous bleomycin injection. The total complication rate was 10.2% (33/325), including 29/352 (8.9%) major complications. Patient-reported mobility decreased in 10/133 (8.8%), was stable in 30/113 (26.5%), improved in 48/113 (42.5%), and was rated symptom-free in 25/113 (22.1%) patients. Aesthetic aspects were rated impaired compared to baseline in 19/113 (16.8%), stable in 21/133 (18.6%), improved in 62/113 (54.9%), and perfect in 11/133 (9.7%) patients. Postprocedural skin hyperpigmentation occurred in 78/113 (69%) patients, remaining unchanged in 24/78 (30.8%), reduced in 51/78 (65.5%), and completely resolved in 3/78 (3.8%) patients. The median VAS pain scale was 4.0 (0-10) preprocedural and 2.0 (0-9) postprocedural. Children/adolescents performed significantly better in all parameters compared to adults (≥ 16 years) (mobility, p = 0.011; aesthetic aspects, p < 0.001; pain, p < 0.001).

conclusionsBEST is effective for treating slow-flow vascular malformations, with few but potentially significant major complications. Regarding patient-reported outcomes, children seem to benefit better compared to older patients, suggesting that BEST should not be restricted to adults. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Bleomycin electrosclerotherapy is a safe and effective approach and therapy should not be restricted to adults due to good clinical outcomes in children.

Indexed as

BleomycinAdolescentAdultAgedAntibiotics, AntineoplasticChildChild, PreschoolElectrochemotherapyFemaleHumansInfantMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesSclerotherapyTreatment OutcomeAntibiotics, AntineoplasticBleomycinBESTBleomycinElectro-chemotherapySclerotherapySlow-flow vascular malformations

Identifiers

PMID38627287
PMCPMC11399160

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.