ArticleClinical cardiology2024
Association between Life's Essential 8 score and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein: A cross-sectional study from NHANES 2015-2018.
Article in Clinical cardiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Relationship Between the "Life's Essential 8" Lifestyle Metrics and Serum High-Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein Levels in South Korea.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Association between Life's Essential 8 score and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein: A cross-sectional study from NHANES 2015-2018.Clinical cardiology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundEarlier studies showed a negative correlation between life's simple 7 (LS7) and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), but no association has been found between life's essential 8 (LE8), an improved version of LS7, and hs-CRP. HYPOTHESIS: This study investigated the association between LE8 and hs-CRP utilizing data from the National Health and Nutritional Examination Survey.
methodsA total of 7229 adults were incorporated in our study. LE8 was scored according to American Heart Association guidelines, and LE8 was divided into health behaviors and health factors. Serum samples of the participants were used to measure hs-CRP. To investigate the association between LE8 and hs-CRP, weighted linear regression, and restricted cubic spline were utilized.
resultsAmong 7229 participants, the average age was 48.03 ± 16.88 years, 3689 (51.2%) were females and the median hs-CRP was 1.92 (0.81-4.49) mg/L. In adjusted weighted linear regression, a negative correlation was observed between the LE8 score and hs-CRP. Compared with the low LE8 score, the moderate LE8 score β was -0.533 (-0.646 to -0.420), and the high LE8 score β was -1.237 (-1.376 to -1.097). Health behaviors and health factors were also negatively associated with hs-CRP. In stratified analyses, the negative correlation between LE8 and hs-CRP remained consistent across subgroups.
conclusionThere was a negative correlation between LE8 as well as its sub-indicator scores and hs-CRP. Maintaining a positive LE8 score may be conducive to lowering the level of hs-CRP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.