SynthesisFrontiers in neurology2024
The effect of cognitive rehabilitation on daily functioning of patients with Alzheimer's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials.
Synthesis in Frontiers in neurology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Consumer and health professional reflections and feedback on the Help After Leaving hospiTal delirium rehabilitation programme.Age and ageing · 2026Article
- Improving Access to Cognitive Interventions for People With Dementia in Australian Community-Based Settings.Australasian journal on ageing · 2026Review
- Mobile Application Applied for Cognitive Rehabilitation: A Systematic Review.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- How do you target cognitive training? Bridging the gap between standard and technological rehabilitation of cognitive domains.Frontiers in psychology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the most prevalent type of dementia and represents 60-80% of dementia cases. AD affects over 32 million people globally, and 8.1% of affected females and 5.4% of affected males were older than 65 years. Cognitive rehabilitation focuses on helping patients develop individualized strategies to obtain or maintain optimal functioning. As of now, there is no complete and systematic meta-analysis on the effects of cognitive rehabilitation on cognitive functioning in AD patients. Objectives: To provide the most recent and extensive pooled analysis and evidence and explore the influence of cognitive rehabilitation on overall cognitive functioning in patients with AD. Methods: We searched articles through several databases such as PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Web of Science, from the inception to June 2023. Studies on cognitive stimulation, cognitive training, and cognitive interventions, and non-English articles were excluded. The outcome measures encompassed the effects of cognitive rehabilitation on the overall cognitive functioning of people with AD (e.g., verbal fluency, behavioral memory, neuropsychiatric status and occupational performance levels). Results: A total of 14 clinical trials were included in this analysis. The meta-analysis showed that cognitive rehabilitation significantly improved quality of life (WMD: 2.87; 95% CI: 0.79, 4.95; Conclusion: Cognitive rehabilitation exhibited a moderate to large impact on both quality of life and occupational performance levels in people with AD. Future studies are required to explore the potential of various cognitive interventions across specific domains, so as to provide more insights into the management of AD. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42023444390.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.