ArticlePlant phenomics (Washington, D.C.)2024
Improved Transformer for Time Series Senescence Root Recognition.
Article in Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- WaveUNet+: Preserving Root System Architecture Integrity in In Situ Root Segmentation via a Unified Spectral-Spatial Framework.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Synthetic-augmented multimodal deep learning fuses dual-angle RGB images and phenology to unlock genotype-informative canopy structural trait in wheat.Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.) · 2026Article
- Multi-modal few-shot learning for anthesis prediction of individual wheat plants.Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.) · 2025Article
- Improved U-Shaped Convolutional Neural Network with Convolutional Block Attention Module and Feature Fusion for Automated Segmentation of Fine Roots in Field Rhizotron Imagery.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Research on Fine-Grained Phenotypic Analysis of Temporal Root Systems - Improved YoloV8seg Applied for Fine-Grained Analysis of In Situ Root Temporal Phenotypes.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The root is an important organ for plants to obtain nutrients and water, and its phenotypic characteristics are closely related to its functions. Deep-learning-based high-throughput in situ root senescence feature extraction has not yet been published. In light of this, this paper suggests a technique based on the transformer neural network for retrieving cotton's in situ root senescence properties. High-resolution in situ root pictures with various levels of senescence are the main subject of the investigation. By comparing the semantic segmentation of the root system by general convolutional neural networks and transformer neural networks, SegFormer-UN (large) achieves the optimal evaluation metrics with mIoU, mRecall, mPrecision, and mF1 metric values of 81.52%, 86.87%, 90.98%, and 88.81%, respectively. The segmentation results indicate more accurate predictions at the connections of root systems in the segmented images. In contrast to 2 algorithms for cotton root senescence extraction based on deep learning and image processing, the in situ root senescence recognition algorithm using the SegFormer-UN model has a parameter count of 5.81 million and operates at a fast speed, approximately 4 min per image. It can accurately identify senescence roots in the image. We propose that the SegFormer-UN model can rapidly and nondestructively identify senescence root in in situ root images, providing important methodological support for efficient crop senescence research.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.