ArticlePlant phenomics (Washington, D.C.)2024
In Situ Root Dataset Expansion Strategy Based on an Improved CycleGAN Generator.
Article in Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- WaveUNet+: Preserving Root System Architecture Integrity in In Situ Root Segmentation via a Unified Spectral-Spatial Framework.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The root system plays a vital role in plants' ability to absorb water and nutrients. In situ root research offers an intuitive approach to exploring root phenotypes and their dynamics. Deep-learning-based root segmentation methods have gained popularity, but they require large labeled datasets for training. This paper presents an expansion method for in situ root datasets using an improved CycleGAN generator. In addition, spatial-coordinate-based target background separation method is proposed, which solves the issue of background pixel variations caused by generator errors. Compared to traditional threshold segmentation methods, this approach demonstrates superior speed, accuracy, and stability. Moreover, through time-division soil image acquisition, diverse culture medium can be replaced in in situ root images, thereby enhancing dataset versatility. After validating the performance of the Improved_UNet network on the augmented dataset, the optimal results show a 0.63% increase in mean intersection over union, 0.41% in F1, and 0.04% in accuracy. In terms of generalization performance, the optimal results show a 33.6% increase in mean intersection over union, 28.11% in F1, and 2.62% in accuracy. The experimental results confirm the feasibility and practicality of the proposed dataset augmentation strategy. In the future, we plan to combine normal mapping with rendering software to achieve more accurate shading simulations of in situ roots. In addition, we aim to create a broader range of images that encompass various crop varieties and soil types.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.