Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38630132›Full record

ReviewAnnals of hematology2024

Thromboprophylaxis in multiple myeloma: a case-based review with practical guidelines.

Charalampos Charalampous, Darshi Shah, Shaji Kumar, Rajshekhar Chakraborty

Abstract readReviewCase Reports
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of hematology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Supportive care in myeloma-when treating the clone alone is not enough.Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Charalampos CharalampousDivision of Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Darshi ShahRenaissance School of Medicine at Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA.
Shaji KumarDivision of Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Rajshekhar ChakrabortyMultiple Myeloma and Amyloidosis Program, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA. rc3360@cumc.columbia.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7336-3003

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) poses a significant challenge in the context of multiple myeloma, with an incidence of up to 10% in newly diagnosed patients and varying frequency in the relapsed/refractory setting. Accurate VTE risk assessment and personalized thromboprophylaxis strategies are important parts of supportive care in myeloma. There are three validated risk assessment models for prediction of VTE risk in newly diagnosed myeloma-SAVED, IMPEDE-VTE, and PRISM. In this review, we delve into the practical applications of VTE risk prediction models in the context of current therapies. By emphasizing the necessity of a tailored approach, we underscore the importance of considering patient-specific, disease-specific, and treatment-specific risk factors in each clinical scenario, and using that data to complement the output from risk assessment models. We also provide a summary of currently available data on VTE thromboprophylaxis in myeloma, and highlight specific situations where direct oral anticoagulants should be strongly considered. Our objective is to fill the critical gaps in VTE prophylaxis and management through the analysis of specific patient cases and provide a practical overview for clinicians.

Indexed as

AnticoagulantsMultiple MyelomaVenous ThromboembolismAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPractice Guidelines as TopicRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsAnticoagulantsMultiple myelomaRisk factorsThromboprophylaxisThrombosisVenous thromboembolism

Identifiers

PMID38630132

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.