Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38630432›Full record

ArticleAccounts of chemical research2024

Structural, Functional, and Genetic Changes Surrounding Electrodes Implanted in the Brain.

Bhavna Gupta, Akash Saxena, Mason L Perillo, Lauren C Wade-Kleyn, Cort H Thompson, Erin K Purcell

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Accounts of chemical research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Chronic alteration of CabioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  6. Biomimetic Cell Membrane-Coated Scaffolds for Enhanced Tissue Regeneration.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Why some BCI should still be called BMI.Nature communications · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Bhavna GuptaNeuroscience Program, Michigan State University, 775 Woodlot Dr., East Lansing, Michigan 48824, United States.
Akash SaxenaInstitute for Quantitative Health Science and Engineering, Michigan State University, 775 Woodlot Dr., East Lansing, Michigan 48824, United States.
Mason L PerilloDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Michigan State University, 775 Woodlot Dr., East Lansing, Michigan 48824, United States.
Lauren C Wade-KleynDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Michigan State University, 775 Woodlot Dr., East Lansing, Michigan 48824, United States.
Cort H ThompsonDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Michigan State University, 775 Woodlot Dr., East Lansing, Michigan 48824, United States.
Erin K PurcellDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Michigan State University, 775 Woodlot Dr., East Lansing, Michigan 48824, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-1523-7513
Michigan State University · US

Funding

Structural and Functional Plasticity Surrounding Implanted NeuroprosthesesR01NS107451 · NINDS · MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY · PI PURCELL, ERIN K · 2019 to 2023
$1.9M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS107451
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Implantable neurotechnology enables monitoring and stimulating of the brain signals responsible for performing cognitive, motor, and sensory tasks. Electrode arrays implanted in the brain are increasingly used in the clinic to treat a variety of sources of neurological diseases and injuries. However, the implantation of a foreign body typically initiates a tissue response characterized by physical disruption of vasculature and the neuropil as well as the initiation of inflammation and the induction of reactive glial states. Likewise, electrical stimulation can induce damage to the surrounding tissue depending on the intensity and waveform parameters of the applied stimulus. These phenomena, in turn, are likely influenced by the surface chemistry and characteristics of the materials employed, but further information is needed to effectively link the biological responses observed to specific aspects of device design. In order to inform improved design of implantable neurotechnology, we are investigating the basic science principles governing device-tissue integration. We are employing multiple techniques to characterize the structural, functional, and genetic changes that occur in the cells surrounding implanted electrodes. First, we have developed a new "device-in-slice" technique to capture chronically implanted electrodes within thick slices of live rat brain tissue for interrogation with single-cell electrophysiology and two-photon imaging techniques. Our data revealed several new observations of tissue remodeling surrounding devices: (a) there was significant disruption of dendritic arbors in neurons near implants, where losses were driven asymmetrically on the implant-facing side. (b) There was a significant loss of dendritic spine densities in neurons near implants, with a shift toward more immature (nonfunctional) morphologies. (c) There was a reduction in excitatory neurotransmission surrounding implants, as evidenced by a reduction in the frequency of excitatory postsynaptic currents (EPSCs). Lastly, (d) there were changes in the electrophysiological underpinnings of neuronal spiking regularity. In parallel, we initiated new studies to explore changes in gene expression surrounding devices through spatial transcriptomics, which we applied to both recording and stimulating arrays. We found that (a) device implantation is associated with the induction of hundreds of genes associated with neuroinflammation, glial reactivity, oligodendrocyte function, and cellular metabolism and (b) electrical stimulation induces gene expression associated with damage or plasticity in a manner dependent upon the intensity of the applied stimulus. We are currently developing computational analysis tools to distill biomarkers of device-tissue interactions from large transcriptomics data sets. These results improve the current understanding of the biological response to electrodes implanted in the brain while producing new biomarkers for benchmarking the effects of novel electrode designs on responses. As the next generation of neurotechnology is developed, it will be increasingly important to understand the influence of novel materials, surface chemistries, and implant architectures on device performance as well as the relationship with the induction of specific cellular signaling pathways.

Indexed as

BrainElectrodes, ImplantedAnimalsRats

Identifiers

PMID38630432
PMCPMC11079975
OpenAlexW4394874151

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.