ArticleAccounts of chemical research2024
Structural, Functional, and Genetic Changes Surrounding Electrodes Implanted in the Brain.
Article in Accounts of chemical research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Research on Multi-Dimensional Bionic Design of Flexible ECG Electrodes for Wearable Monitoring.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Bridging the Gap: Integrated High-Density Microelectrode Arrays for Cellular, Organoid, and Clinical Electrophysiology.Micromachines · 2026Review
- Spatial transcriptomics on an expanded dataset at the brain-electrode interface: exploration of variability and identification of novel biomarkers.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Article
- Adaptive neuromodulation dialogues: navigating current challenges and emerging innovations in neuromodulation system development.Journal of neural engineering · 2025Review
- Chronic alteration of CabioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Biomimetic Cell Membrane-Coated Scaffolds for Enhanced Tissue Regeneration.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2025Review
- Aging diminishes interlaminar functional connectivity in the mouse cortical V1 and CA1 hippocampal regions.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- DiffCoRank: a comprehensive framework for discovering hub genes and differential gene co-expression in brain implant-associated tissue responses.BMC bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Why some BCI should still be called BMI.Nature communications · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Implantable neurotechnology enables monitoring and stimulating of the brain signals responsible for performing cognitive, motor, and sensory tasks. Electrode arrays implanted in the brain are increasingly used in the clinic to treat a variety of sources of neurological diseases and injuries. However, the implantation of a foreign body typically initiates a tissue response characterized by physical disruption of vasculature and the neuropil as well as the initiation of inflammation and the induction of reactive glial states. Likewise, electrical stimulation can induce damage to the surrounding tissue depending on the intensity and waveform parameters of the applied stimulus. These phenomena, in turn, are likely influenced by the surface chemistry and characteristics of the materials employed, but further information is needed to effectively link the biological responses observed to specific aspects of device design. In order to inform improved design of implantable neurotechnology, we are investigating the basic science principles governing device-tissue integration. We are employing multiple techniques to characterize the structural, functional, and genetic changes that occur in the cells surrounding implanted electrodes. First, we have developed a new "device-in-slice" technique to capture chronically implanted electrodes within thick slices of live rat brain tissue for interrogation with single-cell electrophysiology and two-photon imaging techniques. Our data revealed several new observations of tissue remodeling surrounding devices: (a) there was significant disruption of dendritic arbors in neurons near implants, where losses were driven asymmetrically on the implant-facing side. (b) There was a significant loss of dendritic spine densities in neurons near implants, with a shift toward more immature (nonfunctional) morphologies. (c) There was a reduction in excitatory neurotransmission surrounding implants, as evidenced by a reduction in the frequency of excitatory postsynaptic currents (EPSCs). Lastly, (d) there were changes in the electrophysiological underpinnings of neuronal spiking regularity. In parallel, we initiated new studies to explore changes in gene expression surrounding devices through spatial transcriptomics, which we applied to both recording and stimulating arrays. We found that (a) device implantation is associated with the induction of hundreds of genes associated with neuroinflammation, glial reactivity, oligodendrocyte function, and cellular metabolism and (b) electrical stimulation induces gene expression associated with damage or plasticity in a manner dependent upon the intensity of the applied stimulus. We are currently developing computational analysis tools to distill biomarkers of device-tissue interactions from large transcriptomics data sets. These results improve the current understanding of the biological response to electrodes implanted in the brain while producing new biomarkers for benchmarking the effects of novel electrode designs on responses. As the next generation of neurotechnology is developed, it will be increasingly important to understand the influence of novel materials, surface chemistries, and implant architectures on device performance as well as the relationship with the induction of specific cellular signaling pathways.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.