ArticleBiomedical optics express2024
Deep learning-based vessel extraction in 3D confocal microscope images of cleared human glioma tissues.
Article in Biomedical optics express, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development of an Artificial Intelligence-Driven Three-Dimensional Reconstruction Model of Renal Vasculature for Surgical Planning in Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy.The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS · 2026Article
- LiteFreqMamba:lightweight frequency-enhanced Mamba for efficient 3D brain tumor segmentation.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- A high-resolution dataset of mouse brain vasculature for deep learning-based reconstruction.Frontiers in neuroinformatics · 2026Article
- State-of-the-Art Deep Learning Methods for Microscopic Image Segmentation: Applications to Cells, Nuclei, and Tissues.Journal of imaging · 2024Review
- ML-driven segmentation of microvascular features during histological examination of tissue-engineered vascular grafts.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Comprehensive visualization and accurate extraction of tumor vasculature are essential to study the nature of glioma. Nowadays, tissue clearing technology enables 3D visualization of human glioma vasculature at micron resolution, but current vessel extraction schemes cannot well cope with the extraction of complex tumor vessels with high disruption and irregularity under realistic conditions. Here, we developed a framework, FineVess, based on deep learning to automatically extract glioma vessels in confocal microscope images of cleared human tumor tissues. In the framework, a customized deep learning network, named 3D ResCBAM nnU-Net, was designed to segment the vessels, and a novel pipeline based on preprocessing and post-processing was developed to refine the segmentation results automatically. On the basis of its application to a practical dataset, we showed that the FineVess enabled extraction of variable and incomplete vessels with high accuracy in challenging 3D images, better than other traditional and state-of-the-art schemes. For the extracted vessels, we calculated vascular morphological features including fractal dimension and vascular wall integrity of different tumor grades, and verified the vascular heterogeneity through quantitative analysis.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.