ReviewFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2024
Research progress on optimization of
Review in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Flow Cytometry Illuminates Dental Stem Cells: a Systematic Review of Immunomodulatory and Regenerative Breakthroughs.Stem cell reviews and reports · 2025Pooled it
- Serum-induced recovery of proliferative capacity and differentiation potential in aged dental pulp stem cells.Stem cells translational medicine · 2026Article
- Molecular Mechanisms and Clinical Applications of Neural Regeneration Through Dental Pulp Stem Cells.Stem cells international · 2026Review
- Visible-light-triggered BMP-2 release from enzymatically crosslinked marine collagen-alginate hydrogel blends enhances osteogenesis in dental pulp stem cells.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Article
- RNA preservation in human dental pulp for transcriptomic profiling: a comparative multi-parameter study.Frontiers in dental medicine · 2025Article
- Comparative analysis of dental-derived stem cells and alternative stem cell sources: properties and regenerative functions.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Review
- Thermomechanical DNA extraction from infected dental pulp for next-generation sequencing applications.Journal of oral biology and craniofacial researchArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Due to high proliferative capacity, multipotent differentiation, immunomodulatory abilities, and lack of ethical concerns, dental pulp stem cells (DPSCs) are promising candidates for clinical application. Currently, clinical research on DPSCs is in its early stages. The reason for the failure to obtain clinically effective results may be problems with the production process of DPSCs. Due to the different preparation methods and reagent formulations of DPSCs, cell characteristics may be affected and lead to inconsistent experimental results. Preparation of clinical-grade DPSCs is far from ready. To achieve clinical application, it is essential to transit the manufacturing of stem cells from laboratory grade to clinical grade. This review compares and analyzes experimental data on optimizing the preparation methods of DPSCs from extraction to resuscitation, including research articles, invention patents and clinical trials. The advantages and disadvantages of various methods and potential clinical applications are discussed, and factors that could improve the quality of DPSCs for clinical application are proposed. The aim is to summarize the current manufacture of DPSCs in the establishment of a standardized, reliable, safe, and economic method for future preparation of clinical-grade cell products.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.