Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38636264›Full record

ArticleReproductive biology2024

The impact of estradiol supplementation on endometrial thickness and intrauterine insemination outcomes.

Wendy Y Zhang, Megan McCracken, Lisandra Veliz Dominguez, Amy Zhang, Jasmyn Johal, Lusine Aghajanova

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Reproductive biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Wendy Y ZhangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA. Electronic address: wendyz@stanford.edu.
Megan McCrackenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Lisandra Veliz DominguezStanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Amy ZhangQuantitative Sciences Unit, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Jasmyn JohalDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA; Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Lusine AghajanovaDivision of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Sunnyvale, CA, USA.
Stanford University · USCornell University · USStanford Medicine · US

Funding

Spectrum Stanford Center for clinical and Translational Research and EducationUL1TR001085 · NCATS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI CULLEN, MARK RICHARD, GREENBERG, HARRY BERNARD · 2013 to 2017
$37.1M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001085
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The impact of estrogen supplementation during the follicular/proliferative phase on the endometrial lining thickness (EMT) prior to intrauterine insemination (IUI) remains largely unstudied. Our study examined changes in EMT and rates of clinical pregnancy, miscarriage, and live birth for all patients who completed an IUI cycle at Stanford Fertility Center from 2017-2023 (n = 2281 cycles). Cycles with estradiol supplementation (n = 309) were compared to reference cycles without supplementation (n = 1972), with the reference cohort further categorized into cycles with a pre-ovulatory EMT of < 7 mm ("thin-lining", n = 536) and ≥ 7 mm ("normal-lining", n = 1436). The estradiol group had a statistically significant greater change in EMT from baseline to ovulation compared to the thin-lining reference groups (2.4 mm vs 1.9 mm, p < =0.0001). Similar rates of clinical pregnancy and live birth were observed. After adjusting for age, BMI, race/ethnicity, infertility diagnosis, and EMT at trigger, the estradiol cohort had a significantly increased odds of miscarriage versus the entire reference cohort (2.46, 95 % confidence interval [1.18, 5.14], p = 0.02). Thus, although estradiol supplementation had a statistically significant increase in EMT compared to IUI cycles with thin pre-ovulatory EMT (<7 mm), this change did not translate into improved IUI outcomes such as increased rates of clinical pregnancy and live birth or decreased rate of miscarriage. Our study suggests that supplemental estradiol does not appear to improve IUI outcomes.

Indexed as

EndometriumEstradiolInsemination, ArtificialPregnancy RateAdultFemaleHumansLive BirthPregnancyRetrospective StudiesEstradiolEndometrial thicknessEstradiol supplementationInfertilityIntrauterine inseminationThin endometrium

Identifiers

PMID38636264
PMCPMC11208072
OpenAlexW4394903828

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.