Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38636583›Full record

ArticleContraception2024

Comparison of a person-centered pregnancy prevention question and One Key Question to assess postpartum contraceptive needs.

Jayme L Congdon, Eric Vittinghoff, Christine Dehlendorf

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Contraception, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jayme L CongdonDepartment of Pediatrics and Philip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies, University of California, San Francisco, CA, United States. Electronic address: jayme.congdon@ucsf.edu.
Eric VittinghoffDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, CA, United States. Electronic address: eric.vittinghoff@ucsf.edu.
Christine DehlendorfDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA, United States. Electronic address: christine.dehlendorf@ucsf.edu.

Funding

Institutional Career Development Core SupplementKL2TR001870 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI KANAYA, ALKA M., SARKAR, URMIMALA · 2016 to 2025
$19.7M
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR001870
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo explore the relevance of pregnancy intention as a screen for contraceptive needs among postpartum individuals. STUDY

designWe surveyed 234 postpartum individuals to assess the alignment between pregnancy intentions in the next year and current desire to prevent pregnancy.

resultsMost individuals (87%) desired pregnancy prevention now, including 73% of individuals who desired or were ambivalent about pregnancy in the next year.

conclusionA majority of individuals considering pregnancy in the next year desired pregnancy prevention now. Directly assessing current desire to prevent pregnancy may be more specific for contraceptive needs in postpartum individuals. IMPLICATIONS: Our ability to ensure that all individuals who want to prevent pregnancy have access to contraception depends on the use of effective screening questions. These findings prompt consideration of broader clinical implementation of screening for desire to prevent pregnancy in lieu of questions about pregnancy intention in the next year.

Indexed as

ContraceptionIntentionPostpartum PeriodAdolescentAdultContraception BehaviorFamily Planning ServicesFemaleHumansNeeds AssessmentPregnancySurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultContraceptionFamily planningHealth services researchPatient-centered carePostpartum

Identifiers

PMID38636583
PMCPMC13142338

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.