ArticleJournal of pain and symptom management2024
Global Assessment of Palliative Care Need: Serious Health-Related Suffering Measurement Methodology.
Article in Journal of pain and symptom management, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Place of Death of People With Chronic Conditions in Latin America: A Systematic Review.Public health reviews · 2026Pooled it
- A descriptive analysis of hospital-based palliative care services: a case study from Fort Portal Regional Referral Hospital, Uganda.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- More patterns on palliative care identity: An autoethnography contribution.Palliative & supportive care · 2026Article
- Satisfaction with end-of-life care and self-rated health among bereaved family members; a descriptive cross-sectional study in an intensive care context.BMC palliative care · 2026Article
- Children's palliative care in Ghana: a situational analysis.BMC palliative care · 2026Article
- Opioid consumption, availability, and policy alignment in primary hospice and palliative care in China: a multicomponent comparative analysis.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026Article
- Evaluating Palliative Care Needs in Patients with Advanced Non-Malignant Chronic Conditions: An Umbrella Review of Needs Assessment Tools.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Development of the SAVE study protocol to use lived experience to assess the value of serious health-related suffering and palliative care.Communications medicine · 2025Article
- Towards opioid access without excess.The Lancet. Public health · 2025Review
- The evolution of serious health-related suffering from 1990 to 2021: an update to The Lancet Commission on global access to palliative care and pain relief.The Lancet. Global health · 2025Article
- Distributed Opioids in Morphine Equivalent: A Global Measure of Availability for Palliative Care.Journal of pain and symptom management · 2025Article
- Engaging Children and Young People in Pediatric Palliative Care Research: A Scoping Review Protocol of Patient and Public Involvement Practices.HRB open research · 2025Article
- Defining and developing primary palliative care as an essential element of primary health care.Palliative medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors.
Funding
Abstract
contextInequities and gaps in palliative care access are a serious impediment to health systems especially in low- and middle-income countries and the accurate measurement of need across health conditions is a critical step to understanding and addressing the issue. Serious Health-related Suffering (SHS) is a novel methodology to measure the palliative care need and was originally developed by The Lancet Commission on Global Access to Palliative Care and Pain Relief. In 2015, the first iteration - SHS 1.0 - was estimated at over 61 million people worldwide experiencing at least 6 billion days of SHS annually as a result of life-limiting and life-threatening conditions.
objectivesIn this paper, an updated methodology - SHS 2.0 - is presented building on the work of the Lancet Commission and detailing calculations, data requirements, limitations, and assumptions. METHODS AND
resultsThe updates to the original methodology focus on measuring the number of people who die with (decedents) or live with (non-decedents) SHS in a given year to assess the number of people in need of palliative care across health conditions and populations. Detail on the methodology for measuring the number of days of SHS that was pioneered by the Lancet Commission, is also shared, as this second measure is essential for determining the health system responses that are necessary to address palliative care need and must be a priority for future methodological work on SHS.
conclusionsThe methodology encompasses opportunities for applying SHS to future policy making assessment of future research priorities particularly in light of the dearth of data from low- and middle-income countries, and sharing of directions for future work to develop SHS 3.0.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.