Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38637791›Full record

Trial reportBMC medical education2024

Modern software and physical education: can online training enhance gym training?

Linna Ge, Menglu Li, ChangFeng Ning

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC medical education, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Linna GeInstitute of Physical Education, Yancheng Institute of Technology, Yancheng, Jiangsu, China.
Menglu LiInstitute of Physical Education, Yancheng Institute of Technology, Yancheng, Jiangsu, China.
ChangFeng NingInstitute of Physical Education, Yancheng Institute of Technology, Yancheng, Jiangsu, China. ningcf@ycit.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study discusses the effectiveness of a 12-week intervention aimed at improving squat jump and sprint performance among second-year sports students.

methodsThe students were randomly divided into experimental (n = 89) and control (n = 92) groups. In addition to gym training, students of the experimental group also underwent online PE training. The students' performance in Squat Jumps, 30 m sprint, and Progressive Aerobic Cardiovascular Endurance Run (PACER), as well as their situational motivation, were assessed before and after the intervention. Furthermore, the students assessed their physical activity weekly using self-reports.

resultsThe implementation of online training has positively impacted intrinsic and identified motivation, as well as external regulation; however, it was less effective in reducing amotivation compared to traditional gym-based training.

conclusionsThe findings of the study contribute to the data synthesis on the expediency of using modern software in physical education.

Indexed as

Muscle StrengthSportsExerciseHumansMotivationPhysical Education and TrainingMotivationPhysical activityPhysical educationSprintSquat jumpTechnologyUniversity students

Identifiers

PMID38637791
PMCPMC11027400

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.