ArticleInterdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery2024
Validation of large animal models in mechanical valve research: a histologic comparison.
Article in Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Large Animal Models for Preclinical Evaluation of Heart Valve Prostheses, Left Ventricular Assist Devices and Total Artificial Hearts: A Narrative Review.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- A novel decellularization protocol with cryopreservation of pulmonary allografts in an ovine model.Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesMechanical valves still require life-long anticoagulation. Preclinical animal testing is a crucial step in the assessment of valves; however, the chosen animal model should be carefully considered, and a well-controlled animal model of mechanical valve thrombosis has not been established yet. In this study, a histopathologic comparison was performed to evaluate the representativity of pigs and sheep as large animal models in bileaflet mechanical valve thrombosis research.
methods10 pigs and 8 sheep were implanted with a bileaflet mechanical valve in pulmonary position. During follow-up, no anticoagulative therapy was administered. Pigs were sacrificed between 14 and 38 days for explantation and assessment of the valve. Sheep were sacrificed between 71 and 155 days. Thrombus samples were processed and (immuno)histochemical stainings were applied. A pathologist evaluated the samples morphologically and semiquantitatively and compared these samples to available slides from 3 human patients who underwent redo surgery for acute bileaflet mechanical valve thrombosis, caused by insufficient anticoagulation.
resultsAll pigs showed macroscopically evident thrombi on the mechanical valve surface at sacrifice. In contrast, none of the sheep showed any sign of thrombus formation. Histology showed a high fibrin content in thrombi of both human and porcine cases (3/3 vs 8/10). Porcine thrombi showed more cellular organization (0/3 vs 6/10), more calcification (0/3 vs 9/10) and more endothelialization (0/3 vs 6/10). Inflammatory cells were present in all samples and were considered physiological.
conclusionsContrary to sheep, pigs develop thrombi on their mechanical valves in the short-term if no anticoagulation is administered. Histologic comparison of human and porcine thrombi shows comparable findings. The pig model might serve interestingly for further research on valve thrombosis, if it shows not to be an overly aggressive model.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.