ReviewCurrent medicinal chemistry2024
N-Methyl-D-Aspartate (NMDA) Receptor Antagonists and their Pharmacological Implication: A Medicinal Chemistry-oriented Perspective Outline.
Review in Current medicinal chemistry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparison of Preoperative Topical Magnesium Sulfate Spraying and Magnesium Sulfate Gargling for the Prevention of Postoperative Sore Throat after Tracheal Intubation: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Non-Inferiority Trial.Drug design, development and therapy · 2025Trial
- Clinical research progress of esketamine in perioperative neuroprotection: from mechanisms to therapeutic neuroprotection.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
- Advances and challenges in serine in the central nervous system: physicochemistry, physiology, and pharmacology.Metabolic brain disease · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors, i.e., inotropic glutamate receptors, are important in synaptic plasticity, brain growth, memory, and learning. The activation of NMDA is done by neurotransmitter glutamate and co-agonist (glycine or D-serine) binding. However, the over-activation of NMDA elevates the intracellular calcium influx, which causes various neurological diseases and disorders. Therefore, to prevent excitotoxicity and neuronal death, inhibition of NMDA must be done using its antagonist. This review delineates the structure of subunits of NMDA and the conformational changes induced after the binding of agonists (glycine and D-serine) and antagonists (ifenprodil, etc.). Additionally, reported NMDA antagonists from different sources, such as synthetic, semisynthetic, and natural resources, are explained by their mechanism of action and pharmacological role. The comprehensive report also addresses the chemical spacing of NMDA inhibitors and
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.