ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2024
Integrative annotation scores of variants for impact on RNA binding protein activities.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
motivationThe ENCODE project generated a large collection of eCLIP-seq RNA binding protein (RBP) profiling data with accompanying RNA-seq transcriptomes of shRNA knockdown of RBPs. These data could have utility in understanding the functional impact of genetic variants, however their potential has not been fully exploited. We implement INCA (Integrative annotation scores of variants for impact on RBP activities) as a multi-step genetic variant scoring approach that leverages the ENCODE RBP data together with ClinVar and integrates multiple computational approaches to aggregate evidence.
resultsINCA evaluates variant impacts on RBP activities by leveraging genotypic differences in cell lines used for eCLIP-seq. We show that INCA provides critical specificity, beyond generic scoring for RBP binding disruption, for candidate variants and their linkage-disequilibrium partners. As a result, it can, on average, augment scoring of 46.2% of the candidate variants beyond generic scoring for RBP binding disruption and aid in variant prioritization for follow-up analysis. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: INCA is implemented in R and is available at https://github.com/keleslab/INCA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.