ArticleBMC bioinformatics2024
A protein network refinement method based on module discovery and biological information.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe identification of essential proteins can help in understanding the minimum requirements for cell survival and development to discover drug targets and prevent disease. Nowadays, node ranking methods are a common way to identify essential proteins, but the poor data quality of the underlying PIN has somewhat hindered the identification accuracy of essential proteins for these methods in the PIN. Therefore, researchers constructed refinement networks by considering certain biological properties of interacting protein pairs to improve the performance of node ranking methods in the PIN. Studies show that proteins in a complex are more likely to be essential than proteins not present in the complex. However, the modularity is usually ignored for the refinement methods of the PINs.
methodsBased on this, we proposed a network refinement method based on module discovery and biological information. The idea is, first, to extract the maximal connected subgraph in the PIN, and to divide it into different modules by using Fast-unfolding algorithm; then, to detect critical modules according to the orthologous information, subcellular localization information and topology information within each module; finally, to construct a more refined network (CM-PIN) by using the identified critical modules.
resultsTo evaluate the effectiveness of the proposed method, we used 12 typical node ranking methods (LAC, DC, DMNC, NC, TP, LID, CC, BC, PR, LR, PeC, WDC) to compare the overall performance of the CM-PIN with those on the S-PIN, D-PIN and RD-PIN. The experimental results showed that the CM-PIN was optimal in terms of the identification number of essential proteins, precision-recall curve, Jackknifing method and other criteria, and can help to identify essential proteins more accurately.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.