Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38644486›Full record

ReviewPhysiological reports2024

Comparative analysis of ventricular stiffness across species.

Yuu Usui, Akira Hanashima, Ken Hashimoto, Misaki Kimoto, Momoko Ohira, Satoshi Mohri

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Physiological reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yuu UsuiFirst Department of Physiology, Kawasaki Medical School, Kurashiki, Okayama, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-8400-3441
Akira HanashimaFirst Department of Physiology, Kawasaki Medical School, Kurashiki, Okayama, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-0232-6421
Ken HashimotoFirst Department of Physiology, Kawasaki Medical School, Kurashiki, Okayama, Japan.
Misaki KimotoFirst Department of Physiology, Kawasaki Medical School, Kurashiki, Okayama, Japan.
Momoko OhiraFirst Department of Physiology, Kawasaki Medical School, Kurashiki, Okayama, Japan.
Satoshi MohriFirst Department of Physiology, Kawasaki Medical School, Kurashiki, Okayama, Japan.
Kawasaki Medical School · JP

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, Grant/Award Number JP16K01385Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, Grant/Award Number JP17H00859Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, Grant/Award Number JP17H02092Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, Grant/Award Number JP17H06272Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, Grant/Award Number JP20H04508Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, Grant/Award Number JP20H04521Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, Grant/Award Number JP20K21453Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, Grant/Award Number JP21K19933Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, Grant/Award Number JP22K15155Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, Grant/Award Number JP23H00556Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, Grant/Award Number JP25560214Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, Grant/Award Number JP26282127Medical Research Grant in 2010 from Takeda Science FoundationResearch Grant from the Kawasaki Foundation in 2016 from Medical Science and Medical WelfareResearch Project Grant from Kawasaki Medical School H27B10Research Project Grant from Kawasaki Medical School H28B80Research Project Grant from Kawasaki Medical School H30B016Research Project Grant from Kawasaki Medical School H30B041Research Project Grant from Kawasaki Medical School R01B054Research Project Grant from Kawasaki Medical School R02B039Research Project Grant from Kawasaki Medical School R03B050Research Project Grant from Kawasaki Medical School R03S005Research Project Grant from Kawasaki Medical School R05B016The Futaba research grant program
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Investigating ventricular diastolic properties is crucial for understanding the physiological cardiac functions in organisms and unraveling the pathological mechanisms of cardiovascular disorders. Ventricular stiffness, a fundamental parameter that defines ventricular diastolic functions in chordates, is typically analyzed using the end-diastolic pressure-volume relationship (EDPVR). However, comparing ventricular stiffness accurately across chambers of varying maximum volume capacities has been a long-standing challenge. As one of the solutions to this problem, we propose calculating a relative ventricular stiffness index by applying an exponential approximation formula to the EDPVR plot data of the relationship between ventricular pressure and values of normalized ventricular volume by the ventricular weight. This article reviews the potential, utility, and limitations of using normalized EDPVR analysis in recent studies. Herein, we measured and ranked ventricular stiffness in differently sized and shaped chambers using ex vivo ventricular pressure-volume analysis data from four animals: Wistar rats, red-eared slider turtles, masu salmon, and cherry salmon. Furthermore, we have discussed the mechanical effects of intracellular and extracellular viscoelastic components, Titin (Connectin) filaments, collagens, physiological sarcomere length, and other factors that govern ventricular stiffness. Our review provides insights into the comparison of ventricular stiffness in different-sized ventricles between heterologous and homologous species, including non-model organisms.

Indexed as

Heart VentriclesAnimalsDiastoleRatsSalmonSpecies SpecificityTurtlesVentricular Functioncollagenend‐diastolic pressure‐volume relationshipTitin (Connectin)ventricular stiffness

Identifiers

PMID38644486
PMCPMC11033294
OpenAlexW4395007631

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.