Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38645156›Full record

ArticleResearch square2024

The challenge of improving long-lasting insecticidal nets coverage on Bioko Island: using data to adapt distribution strategies.

Guillermo A García, David S Galick, Jordan M Smith, Marcos Mbulito Iyanga, Matilde Riloha Rivas, Jeremías Nzamío Mba Eyono, Wonder P Phiri, Olivier Tresor Donfack, David L Smith, Carlos A Guerra

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in Research square, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Guillermo A GarcíaMCD Global Health, 8403 Colesville Road, Suite 425, 20910 Silver Spring, USA.
David S GalickMCD Global Health, Av. Parques de Africa, Malabo, Equatorial Guinea.
Jordan M SmithMCD Global Health, 8403 Colesville Road, Suite 425, 20910 Silver Spring, USA.
Marcos Mbulito IyangaMCD Global Health, Av. Parques de Africa, Malabo, Equatorial Guinea.
Matilde Riloha RivasNational Malaria Control Program, Ministry of Health and Social Welfare of Equatorial Guinea, Malabo, Equatorial Guinea.
Jeremías Nzamío Mba EyonoMCD Global Health, Av. Parques de Africa, Malabo, Equatorial Guinea.
Wonder P PhiriMCD Global Health, Av. Parques de Africa, Malabo, Equatorial Guinea.
Olivier Tresor DonfackMCD Global Health, Av. Parques de Africa, Malabo, Equatorial Guinea.
David L SmithInstitute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington, 2301 Fifth Avenue, 98121 Seattle, USA.
Carlos A GuerraMCD Global Health, 8403 Colesville Road, Suite 425, 20910 Silver Spring, USA.

Funding

Spatial Targeting and Adaptive Vector Control for Residual Transmission and Malaria Elimination in Urban African SettingsR01AI163398 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI SMITH, DAVID L. · 2021 to 2025
$3.2M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI163398
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Since 2015, malaria vector control on Bioko Island has relied heavily upon long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLIN) to complement other interventions. Despite significant resources utilised, however, achieving and maintaining high coverage has been elusive. Here, core LLIN indicators were used to assess and redefine distribution strategies. Methods: LLIN indicators were estimated for Bioko Island between 2015 and 2022 using a 1×1 km grid of areas. The way these indicators interacted was used to critically assess coverage targets. Particular attention was paid to spatial heterogeneity and to differences between urban Malabo, the capital, and the rural periphery. Results: LLIN coverage according to all indicators varied substantially across areas, decreased significantly soon after mass distribution campaigns (MDC) and, with few exceptions, remained consistently below the recommended target. Use was strongly correlated with population access, particularly in Malabo. After a change in strategy in Malabo from MDC to fixed distribution points, use-to-access showed significant improvement, indicating those who obtained their nets from these sources were more likely to keep them and use them. Moreover, their use rates were significantly higher than those of whom sourced their nets elsewhere. Conclusions: Striking a better balance between LLIN distribution efficiency and coverage represents a major challenge as LLIN retention and use rates remain low despite high access resulting from MDC. The cost benefit of fixed distribution points in Malabo was deemed significant, providing a viable alternative for guaranteeing access to LLINs to those who use them.

Indexed as

coverageLLIN indicatorslong-lasting insecticidal netsmalariamalaria indicator surveymass-distribution campaign

Identifiers

PMID38645156
PMCPMC11030524

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.