Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38645254›Full record

ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2024

An accurate and rapidly calibrating speech neuroprosthesis.

Nicholas S Card, Maitreyee Wairagkar, Carrina Iacobacci, Xianda Hou, Tyler Singer-Clark, Francis R Willett, Erin M Kunz, Chaofei Fan, Maryam Vahdati Nia, Darrel R Deo and 8 more

Open access · greenAbstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Nicholas S CardDepartments of Neurological Surgery, University of California Davis, Davis, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6858-268X
Maitreyee WairagkarDepartments of Neurological Surgery, University of California Davis, Davis, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9546-2843
Carrina IacobacciDepartments of Neurological Surgery, University of California Davis, Davis, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1690-6272
Xianda HouDepartments of Neurological Surgery, University of California Davis, Davis, CA, USA.ORCID 0009-0002-2066-8561
Tyler Singer-ClarkDepartments of Neurological Surgery, University of California Davis, Davis, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8636-5075
Francis R WillettDepartments of Neurosurgery, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Erin M KunzDepartments of Electrical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.ORCID 0009-0003-5246-6937
Chaofei FanDepartments of Computer Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2549-548X
Maryam Vahdati NiaDepartments of Neurological Surgery, University of California Davis, Davis, CA, USA.
Darrel R DeoDepartments of Neurosurgery, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1929-8383
Aparna SrinivasanDepartments of Neurological Surgery, University of California Davis, Davis, CA, USA.
Eun Young ChoiDepartments of Neurosurgery, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Matthew F GlasserDepartments of Radiology and Neuroscience, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO, USA.
Leigh R HochbergSchool of Engineering and Carney Institute for Brain Sciences, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0261-2273
Jaimie M HendersonDepartments of Neurosurgery, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3276-2267
Kiarash ShahlaieDepartments of Neurological Surgery, University of California Davis, Davis, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9204-6759
David M BrandmanDepartments of Neurological Surgery, University of California Davis, Davis, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3224-7019
Sergey D StaviskyDepartments of Neurological Surgery, University of California Davis, Davis, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5238-0573
Neurological Surgery · USStanford University · USAllen Institute for Brain Science · USHoward Hughes Medical Institute · USNeurosciences Institute · USWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

Single-neuron population dynamics in human speech motor cortex for a speech prosthesisU01DC019430 · NIDCD · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Shaul Druckmann, JAIMIE M HENDERSON · 2021 to 2026
$4.5M
Intuitive, complete neural control of tablet computers for communicationU01DC017844 · NIDCD · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI HOCHBERG, LEIGH R · 2019 to 2025
$4.3M
Understanding and restoring speech production using an intracortical brain-computer interfaceDP2DC021055 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI STAVISKY, SERGEY · 2022 to 2025
$2.3M
NIDCD NIH HHS DP2 DC021055NIDCD NIH HHS U01 DC017844NIDCD NIH HHS U01 DC019430
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brain-computer interfaces can enable rapid, intuitive communication for people with paralysis by transforming the cortical activity associated with attempted speech into text on a computer screen. Despite recent advances, communication with brain-computer interfaces has been restricted by extensive training data requirements and inaccurate word output. A man in his 40's with ALS with tetraparesis and severe dysarthria (ALSFRS-R = 23) was enrolled into the BrainGate2 clinical trial. He underwent surgical implantation of four microelectrode arrays into his left precentral gyrus, which recorded neural activity from 256 intracortical electrodes. We report a speech neuroprosthesis that decoded his neural activity as he attempted to speak in both prompted and unstructured conversational settings. Decoded words were displayed on a screen, then vocalized using text-to-speech software designed to sound like his pre-ALS voice. On the first day of system use, following 30 minutes of attempted speech training data, the neuroprosthesis achieved 99.6% accuracy with a 50-word vocabulary. On the second day, the size of the possible output vocabulary increased to 125,000 words, and, after 1.4 additional hours of training data, the neuroprosthesis achieved 90.2% accuracy. With further training data, the neuroprosthesis sustained 97.5% accuracy beyond eight months after surgical implantation. The participant has used the neuroprosthesis to communicate in self-paced conversations for over 248 hours. In an individual with ALS and severe dysarthria, an intracortical speech neuroprosthesis reached a level of performance suitable to restore naturalistic communication after a brief training period.

Identifiers

PMID38645254
PMCPMC11030484
OpenAlexW4390245204

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.