ArticleHealth information science and systems2024
Exploiting biochemical data to improve osteosarcoma diagnosis with deep learning.
Article in Health information science and systems, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- From imaging to omics: deep learning is bridging MRI and liquid biopsy in bone tumor diagnosis.Journal of bone oncology · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Primary Malignant Bone Tumor Imaging: A Narrative Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Early and accurate diagnosis of osteosarcomas (OS) is of great clinical significance, and machine learning (ML) based methods are increasingly adopted. However, current ML-based methods for osteosarcoma diagnosis consider only X-ray images, usually fail to generalize to new cases, and lack explainability. In this paper, we seek to explore the capability of deep learning models in diagnosing primary OS, with higher accuracy, explainability, and generality. Concretely, we analyze the added value of integrating the biochemical data, i.e., alkaline phosphatase (ALP) and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), and design a model that incorporates the numerical features of ALP and LDH and the visual features of X-ray imaging through a late fusion approach in the feature space. We evaluate this model on real-world clinic data with 848 patients aged from 4 to 81. The experimental results reveal the effectiveness of incorporating ALP and LDH simultaneously in a late fusion approach, with the accuracy of the considered 2608 cases increased to 97.17%, compared to 94.35% in the baseline. Grad-CAM visualizations consistent with orthopedic specialists further justified the model's explainability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.