ArticleCureus2024
Sarcopenia, Eosinophil-to-Platelet Ratio, and C-reactive Protein as Predictors of Adverse Events in Patients With Acute Exacerbations of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Prospective Observational Study.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Frailty in COPD: Clinical Impact, Diagnosis, Biomarkers, and Management Strategies.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2025Pooled it
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBiomarkers such as sarcopenia, eosinopenia, and C-reactive protein (CRP) may predict adverse events in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbations. We aimed to determine their prognostic utility and accuracy versus conventional measures.
methodsThis was a prospective analysis of COPD patients hospitalized for acute exacerbations for more than one year. Patients with primary diagnoses other than COPD were excluded. A total of 200 participants were screened, and 50 experienced adverse events, including mortality, rehospitalization, prolonged stay, hypoxemia, or hypercapnia. Data on demographics, lung function, symptoms, nutrition, frailty, sarcopenia, the eosinophil-to-platelet ratio (EPR), and CRP were extracted. Differences between groups were analyzed using t-tests and regression modeling.
resultsElevated CRP and a low EPR were significant predictors of adverse events after adjustment, with CRP having an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.71 (0.64-0.80) and EPR having an AUC of 0.76 (0.61-0.79) for composite outcomes. According to the multivariate logistic regression analysis, sarcopenia (adjusted Or (aOR)-1.97 (1.87-4.44)), EPR (aOR-2.33 (1.02-5.32)), and CRP (aOR-2.09 (1.01-3.18)) remained significant.
conclusionThe EPR and CRP levels are useful prognostic markers of in-hospital morbidity and mortality during COPD exacerbations. However, multidimensional assessments incorporating other treatable traits may further optimize risk prediction and reduce adverse outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.