ArticleCureus2024
Exploring Periostracum as an Alternative Root Canal Irrigant: Insights From Zebrafish Embryo Experiments.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives Root canal treatments aim to eliminate biofilms effectively. Considering the limitations of chemical irrigants, there is growing interest in natural alternatives like periostracum due to their antibacterial and fouling-resistant properties. This study aimed to assess periostracum's toxicity as a root canal irrigant by investigating its effects on zebrafish embryos' heart rate, survival rate, and hatching rate, as well as inflammation studies using neutral red assays comparing it to standard irrigants like ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), chlorhexidine (CHX), and sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl). Materials and methods Zebrafish embryos were exposed to varying concentrations of periostracum irrigant and standard irrigants. Heart rate, survival rate, and hatching rate were evaluated as indicators of developmental toxicity using microscopy. Statistical analysis, utilizing GraphPad Prism software (version 5.03, GraphPad Software, LLC, San Diego, California, United States), involved one-way ANOVA and Tukey's post-hoc test to determine significance levels (p < 0.05) across control and other groups based on triplicate means and standard deviation. Results The periostracum irrigant demonstrated superior survival rates, heart rates, and hatching rates at specific concentrations compared to standard irrigants (p < 0.01), maintaining favorable heart rates and hatching rates at those concentrations. However, higher concentrations resulted in diminished hatching rates (p < 0.05). Additionally, this study revealed increased inflammation when larvae were treated with NaOCl, EDTA, and CHX. Conversely, no inflammation was observed when subjected to periostracum irrigants. These findings suggest potential advantages of periostracum as a root canal irrigant due to its increased biocompatibility. Conclusion Periostracum displayed promising attributes in zebrafish embryo experiments, such as stable heart rate, hatching rate, and survival rate, along with reduced developmental toxicity and inflammation, indicating potential advantages as a root canal irrigant, including reduced toxicity compared to conventional agents. Further research involving diverse demographics and long-term effects is crucial to validate periostracum's clinical applicability and safety in endodontic therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.