ArticleCureus2024
Evaluating the Cost-Effectiveness of Folic Acid Versus Methyltetrahydrofolate in Preventing Preeclampsia in Makassar, Indonesia.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPreeclampsia is a condition of elevated blood pressure with proteinuria that occurs during pregnancy and is a complication of elevated blood pressure. It usually occurs after the 20th week of pregnancy. This could be fatal for the mother after birth and the baby if it occurs before birth. The goal of this study is to investigate the risk, cost-effectiveness, and effective doses of folic acid (B9).
methodThis study is an observational study with a cohort design and random simple sampling data collection. Data was collected from the Cahaya Ibu Pharmacy Store in Makassar from 164 patients.
resultChi-square statistical analysis data showed a significant risk relationship between pregnant women and the development of hypertension compared with nonpregnant patients, with a p-value of 0.001. Her risk level for the event reaches twice, as evidenced by her odds ratio reaching 6.9 times. The results of cost analytics showed folic acid had an equal effect on women's reduced risk of preeclampsia as methyltetrahydrofolate.
conclusionsUsing folic acid early in pregnancy planning is a great opportunity to reduce the incidence of preeclampsia. The ICER value was obtained at $0.293, so an increase in the cost of that amount was needed to improve the effectiveness of therapy by patients using folic acid compared to patients with methyltetrahydrofolate therapy. Therefore, folic acid is more cost-effective compared to methyltetrahydrofolate.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.