Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38646441›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2024

Profiling of serum metabolome of breast cancer: multi-cancer features discriminate between healthy women and patients with breast cancer.

Katarzyna Mrowiec, Julia Debik, Karol Jelonek, Agata Kurczyk, Lucyna Ponge, Agata Wilk, Marcela Krzempek, Guro F Giskeødegård, Tone F Bathen, Piotr Widłak

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Identification of a Novel Biomarker Panel for Breast Cancer Screening.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Katarzyna Mrowiec *Center for Translational Research and Molecular Biology of Cancer, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Gliwice, Poland.
Julia Debik *Department of Circulation and Medical Imaging, The Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Karol JelonekCenter for Translational Research and Molecular Biology of Cancer, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Gliwice, Poland.
Agata KurczykDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Gliwice, Poland.
Lucyna PongeCenter for Translational Research and Molecular Biology of Cancer, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Gliwice, Poland.
Agata WilkDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Gliwice, Poland.
Marcela KrzempekDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Gliwice, Poland.
Guro F GiskeødegårdDepartment of Circulation and Medical Imaging, The Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Tone F BathenDepartment of Circulation and Medical Imaging, The Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Piotr Widłak2nd Department of Radiology, Medical University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland.
The Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology · PLNorwegian University of Science and Technology · NOGdańsk Medical University · PLSilesian University of Technology · PLSt Olav's University Hospital · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The progression of solid cancers is manifested at the systemic level as molecular changes in the metabolome of body fluids, an emerging source of cancer biomarkers. Methods: We analyzed quantitatively the serum metabolite profile using high-resolution mass spectrometry. Metabolic profiles were compared between breast cancer patients (n=112) and two groups of healthy women (from Poland and Norway; n=95 and n=112, respectively) with similar age distributions. Results: Despite differences between both cohorts of controls, a set of 43 metabolites and lipids uniformly discriminated against breast cancer patients and healthy women. Moreover, smaller groups of female patients with other types of solid cancers (colorectal, head and neck, and lung cancers) were analyzed, which revealed a set of 42 metabolites and lipids that uniformly differentiated all three cancer types from both cohorts of healthy women. A common part of both sets, which could be called a multi-cancer signature, contained 23 compounds, which included reduced levels of a few amino acids (alanine, aspartate, glutamine, histidine, phenylalanine, and leucine/isoleucine), lysophosphatidylcholines (exemplified by LPC(18:0)), and diglycerides. Interestingly, a reduced concentration of the most abundant cholesteryl ester (CE(18:2)) typical for other cancers was the least significant in the serum of breast cancer patients. Components present in a multi-cancer signature enabled the establishment of a well-performing breast cancer classifier, which predicted cancer with a very high precision in independent groups of women (AUC>0.95). Discussion: In conclusion, metabolites critical for discriminating breast cancer patients from controls included components of hypothetical multi-cancer signature, which indicated wider potential applicability of a general serum metabolome cancer biomarker.

Indexed as

biomarkerbreast cancerhigh-resolution mass spectrometrymetabolomicsmulticancer signatureserum metabolomeThe HUNT study

Identifiers

PMID38646441
PMCPMC11027565
OpenAlexW4393947398

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.