Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38647035›Full record

ArticleHuman brain mapping2024

Sex classification from functional brain connectivity: Generalization to multiple datasets.

Lisa Wiersch, Patrick Friedrich, Sami Hamdan, Vera Komeyer, Felix Hoffstaedter, Kaustubh R Patil, Simon B Eickhoff, Susanne Weis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human brain mapping, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. The progression of sex differences in brain networks across the lifespan.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Lisa WierschInstitute of Systems Neuroscience, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8006-8678
Patrick FriedrichInstitute of Systems Neuroscience, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Sami HamdanInstitute of Systems Neuroscience, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Vera KomeyerInstitute of Systems Neuroscience, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Felix HoffstaedterInstitute of Systems Neuroscience, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Kaustubh R PatilInstitute of Systems Neuroscience, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Simon B EickhoffInstitute of Systems Neuroscience, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Susanne WeisInstitute of Systems Neuroscience, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.

Funding

Meta-anaylsis in human brain mappingR01MH074457 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCIENCE CENTER · PI FOX, PETER THORNTON · 2006 to 2024
$10.5M
Meta-analysis in human brain mappingR56MH074457 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCIENCE CENTER · PI FOX, PETER THORNTON · 2020 to 2020
$543k
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH074457NIMH NIH HHS R01-MH074457NIMH NIH HHS R56 MH074457
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Machine learning (ML) approaches are increasingly being applied to neuroimaging data. Studies in neuroscience typically have to rely on a limited set of training data which may impair the generalizability of ML models. However, it is still unclear which kind of training sample is best suited to optimize generalization performance. In the present study, we systematically investigated the generalization performance of sex classification models trained on the parcelwise connectivity profile of either single samples or compound samples of two different sizes. Generalization performance was quantified in terms of mean across-sample classification accuracy and spatial consistency of accurately classifying parcels. Our results indicate that the generalization performance of parcelwise classifiers (pwCs) trained on single dataset samples is dependent on the specific test samples. Certain datasets seem to "match" in the sense that classifiers trained on a sample from one dataset achieved a high accuracy when tested on the respected other one and vice versa. The pwCs trained on the compound samples demonstrated overall highest generalization performance for all test samples, including one derived from a dataset not included in building the training samples. Thus, our results indicate that both a large sample size and a heterogeneous data composition of a training sample have a central role in achieving generalizable results.

Indexed as

ConnectomeMachine LearningMagnetic Resonance ImagingAdultBrainDatasets as TopicFemaleHumansMaleSex CharacteristicsYoung Adultbig datageneralizabilitymachine learningneuroimagingresting‐state functional connectivitysex classification

Identifiers

PMID38647035
PMCPMC11034006

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.