ReviewHeart (British Cardiac Society)2024
Sarcopenia and aortic valve disease.
Review in Heart (British Cardiac Society), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- The association between geriatric nutritional risk index and mortality risk of patients after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a meta-analysis.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Pooled it
- The Association of NT-proBNP With Maximum Tongue Pressure After Cardiac Surgery: A Cross-Sectional Study.Journal of oral rehabilitation · 2026Article
- Effect of sarcopenia on risk of atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Gender Matters: A State-of-the-Art Review of Transcatheter Structural Interventions in Older Women Vs Men.JACC. Advances · 2025Article
- Advancements and Perspectives in the Bioprosthetic Heart Valve: A Comprehensive Review on Biomaterial Processing and Emerging Polymeric Materials.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025Review
- The Association Between Sarcopenia Index and Aortic Valve Sclerosis in Coronary Artery Disease Patients: Insights from a Retrospective Cross-Sectional Analysis and Animal Models.Vascular health and risk management · 2025Article
- Prognostic impact of muscle ultrasound-guided diagnosis of sarcopenia in older adults with severe aortic stenosis.European geriatric medicine · 2024Article
- Novel CT-derived markers for enhanced long-term risk stratification in the planning of TAVR for aortic stenosis.Journal of cardiovascular computed tomographyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 11 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Valvular heart disease, including calcific or degenerative aortic stenosis (AS), is increasingly prevalent among the older adult population. Over the last few decades, treatment of severe AS has been revolutionised following the development of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Despite improvements in outcomes, older adults with competing comorbidities and geriatric syndromes have suboptimal quality of life outcomes, highlighting the cumulative vulnerability that persists despite valve replacement. Sarcopenia, characterised by loss of muscle strength, mass and function, affects 21%-70% of older adults with AS. Sarcopenia is an independent predictor of short-term and long-term outcomes after TAVR and should be incorporated as a prognostic marker in preprocedural planning. Early diagnosis and treatment of sarcopenia may reduce morbidity and mortality and improve quality of life following TAVR. The adverse effects of sarcopenia can be mitigated through resistance training and optimisation of nutritional status. This is most efficacious when administered before sarcopenia has progressed to advanced stages. Management should be individualised based on the patient's wishes/preferences, care goals and physical capability. Exercise during the preoperative waiting period may be safe and effective in most patients with severe AS. However, future studies are needed to establish the benefits of prehabilitation in improving quality of life outcomes after TAVR procedures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.