ArticleStem cell research & therapy2024
DPSCs regulate epithelial-T cell interactions in oral submucous fibrosis.
Article in Stem cell research & therapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Dissecting oral premalignant carcinogenesis: spatial omics mechanisms and nanomedicine-driven therapeutic innovation.Molecular cancer · 2026Review
- The multistep progression of areca nut-induced oral cancer: a mechanistic roadmap from pathogenesis to precision therapy.Life medicine · 2026Review
- Remodeling mechanisms and intervention strategies of the oral mucosal immune barrier.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Role of Stem Cells and Stem Cell Markers in Oral Potentially Malignant Disorders and Malignant Transformation: A Systematic Review.Stem cells international · 2026Review
- Biomaterial-based therapeutic strategies for oral submucous fibrosis.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Review
- Induction and characterization of oral submucous fibrosis model with different pathological stages in rats and mice.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Precision Recovery After Spinal Cord Injury: Integrating CRISPR Technologies, AI-Driven Therapeutics, Single-Cell Omics, and System Neuroregeneration.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- DPSCs modulate synovial macrophage polarization and efferocytosis via PINK1/Parkin-dependent mitophagy.Stem cell research & therapy · 2025Article
- Route of Application and Dose Evaluation of Dental Pulp Stem Cells for the Treatment of Sialadenitis Caused by Sjögren's Syndrome: A Preclinical Study.Biomedicines · 2025Article
- Oral submucous fibrosis: pathogenesis and therapeutic approaches.International journal of oral science · 2025Review
- Choosing the proper animal model for oral submucous fibrosis research: considerations and challenges.Frontiers in physiology · 2025Review
- A New Rat Model of Sacral Cord Injury Producing a Neurogenic Bladder and Its Functional and Mechanistic Studies.Biomolecules · 2024Article
- Development and Evaluation of the Biological Activities of a Plain Mucoadhesive Hydrogel as a Potential Vehicle for Oral Mucosal Drug Delivery.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundOral submucous fibrosis (OSF) is a precancerous lesion characterized by fibrous tissue deposition, the incidence of which correlates positively with the frequency of betel nut chewing. Prolonged betel nut chewing can damage the integrity of the oral mucosal epithelium, leading to chronic inflammation and local immunological derangement. However, currently, the underlying cellular events driving fibrogenesis and dysfunction are incompletely understood, such that OSF has few treatment options with limited therapeutic effectiveness. Dental pulp stem cells (DPSCs) have been recognized for their anti-inflammatory and anti-fibrosis capabilities, making them promising candidates to treat a range of immune, inflammatory, and fibrotic diseases. However, the application of DPSCs in OSF is inconclusive. Therefore, this study aimed to explore the pathogenic mechanism of OSF and, based on this, to explore new treatment options.
methodsA human cell atlas of oral mucosal tissues was compiled using single-cell RNA sequencing to delve into the underlying mechanisms. Epithelial cells were reclustered to observe the heterogeneity of OSF epithelial cells and their communication with immune cells. The results were validated in vitro, in clinicopathological sections, and in animal models. In vivo, the therapeutic effect and mechanism of DPSCs were characterized by histological staining, immunohistochemical staining, scanning electron microscopy, and atomic force microscopy.
resultsA unique epithelial cell population, Epi1.2, with proinflammatory and profibrotic functions, was predominantly found in OSF. Epi1.2 cells also induced the fibrotic process in fibroblasts by interacting with T cells through receptor-ligand crosstalk between macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF)-CD74 and C-X-C motif chemokine receptor 4 (CXCR4). Furthermore, we developed OSF animal models and simulated the clinical local injection process in the rat buccal mucosa using DPSCs to assess their therapeutic impact and mechanism. In the OSF rat model, DPSCs demonstrated superior therapeutic effects compared with the positive control (glucocorticoids), including reducing collagen deposition and promoting blood vessel regeneration. DPSCs mediated immune homeostasis primarily by regulating the numbers of KRT19
conclusionsGiven the current ambiguity surrounding the cause of OSF and the limited treatment options available, our study reveals that epithelial cells and their crosstalk with T cells play an important role in the mechanism of OSF and suggests the therapeutic promise of DPSCs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.