ArticleFrontiers in neurology2024
Analysis of spinal muscular atrophy carrier screening results in 32,416 pregnant women and 7,231 prepregnant women.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Retrospective analysis of spinal muscular atrophy in tunisian population: phenotypic-genotypic associations and considerations for therapeutic advancement.Neurogenetics · 2026Article
- Disease characteristics and treatment status of genetically confirmed spinal muscular atrophy patients: a cross-sectional survey in China.BMC neurology · 2025Article
- Prenatal Management of Spinal Muscular Atrophy in the Era of Genetic Screening and Emerging Opportunities in In Utero Therapy.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Application of Biomarkers in Spinal Muscular Atrophy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Saliva Sample-Based Non-Invasive Carrier Screening for Spinal Muscular Atrophy, Hereditary Hearing Loss, and Thalassemia in 13,926 Women of Reproductive Age From South Zhejiang.Molecular genetics & genomic medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is an autosomal recessive disease that is one of the most common in childhood neuromuscular disorders. Our screenings are more meaningful programs in preventing birth defects, providing a significant resource for healthcare professionals, genetic counselors, and policymakers involved in designing strategies to prevent and manage SMA. Method: We screened 39,647 participants from 2020 to the present by quantitative real-time PCR, including 7,231 pre-pregnancy participants and 32,416 pregnancy participants, to detect the presence of SMN1 gene EX7 and EX8 deletion in the DNA samples provided by the subjects. To validate the accuracy of our findings, we also utilized the Multiplex Ligation-dependent Probe Amplification (MLPA) to confirm the reliability of screening results obtained by quantitative real-time PCR. Result: Among the 39,647 participants who were screened, 726 participants were the carriers of Conclusion: This study provides crucial insights into the prevalence and distribution of SMA carriers among the female population. The identification of 726 asymptomatic carriers highlights the necessity of comprehensive screening programs to identify at-risk individuals and ensure appropriate interventions are in place to minimize the impact of SMA-related conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.