ArticleHeliyon2024
Multimodal deep transfer learning to predict retinal vein occlusion macular edema recurrence after anti-VEGF therapy.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Artificial Intelligence Applications in Sickle Cell Retinopathy Imaging: Current Progress, Challenges, and Future Directions.Journal of ophthalmology · 2026Review
- Subretinal injection of balanced salt solution for macular edema secondary to retinal vein occlusion.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Review
- Global trends in retinal vein occlusion studies from 2004 to 2023: a bibliometric analysis.International journal of ophthalmology · 2025Article
- Integration of peripheral blood-based systemic inflammatory indices and retinal imaging using interpretable machine learning for predicting anti-VEGF treatment response in macular edema secondary to retinal vein occlusion.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To develop a multimodal deep transfer learning (DTL) fusion model using optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) images to predict the recurrence of retinal vein occlusion (RVO) and macular edema (ME) after three consecutive anti-VEGF therapies. Methods: This retrospective cross-sectional study consisted of 2800 B-scan OCTA macular images collected from 140 patients with RVO-ME. The central macular thickness (CMT) > 250 μm was used as a criterion for recurrence in the three-month follow-up after three injections of anti-VEGF therapy. The qualified OCTA image preprocessing and the lesion area segmentation were performed by senior ophthalmologists. We developed and validated the clinical, DTL, and multimodal fusion models based on clinical and extracted OCTA imaging features. The performance of the models and experts predictions were evaluated using several performance metrics, including the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity. Results: The DTL models exhibited higher prediction efficacy than the clinical models and experts' predictions. Among the DTL models, the Vgg19 performed better than that of the other models, with an AUC of 0.968 (95 % CI, 0.943-0.994), accuracy of 0.913, sensitivity of 0.922, and specificity of 0.902 in the validation cohort. Moreover, the fusion Vgg19 model showed the highest prediction efficacy among all the models, with an AUC of 0.972 (95 % CI, 0.946-0.997), accuracy of 0.935, sensitivity of 0.935, and specificity of 0.934 in the validation cohort. Conclusions: Multimodal fusion DTL models showed robust performance in predicting RVO-ME recurrence and may be applied to assist clinicians in determining patients' follow-up time after anti-VEGF therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.