Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38658966›Full record

ArticleDiabetology & metabolic syndrome2024

Causal effect of gut microbiota and diabetic nephropathy: a Mendelian randomization study.

Ganyuan He, Jiayi Chen, Wenke Hao, Wenxue Hu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diabetology & metabolic syndrome, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Towards Microbiota-Targeted Interventions in Acute Pancreatitis: Evidence From Meta-Analysis and Mendelian Randomization.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ganyuan HeDepartment of Nephrology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Guangdong Provincial Geriatrics Institute, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Jiayi ChenDepartment of Nephrology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Guangdong Provincial Geriatrics Institute, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Wenke HaoDepartment of Nephrology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Guangdong Provincial Geriatrics Institute, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China. hwk1964@sina.com.
Wenxue HuDepartment of Nephrology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Guangdong Provincial Geriatrics Institute, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China. wuleihu@126.com.
Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences · CN

Funding

the General Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China 82270780
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe interaction of dysbiosis of gut microbiota (GM) with diabetic nephropathy (DN) drew our attention and a better understanding of GM on DN might provide potential therapeutic approaches. However, the exact causal effect of GM on DN remains unknown.

methodsWe applied two-sample Mendelian Randomization (MR) analysis, including inverse variance weighted (IVW), MR-Egger methods, etc., to screen the significant bacterial taxa based on the GWAS data. Sensitivity analysis was conducted to assess the robustness of MR results. To identify the most critical factor on DN, Mendelian randomization-Bayesian model averaging (MR-BMA) method was utilized. Then, whether the reverse causality existed was verified by reverse MR analysis. Finally, transcriptome MR analysis was performed to investigate the possible mechanism of GM on DN.

resultsAt locus-wide significance levels, the results of IVW suggested that order Bacteroidales (odds ratio (OR) = 1.412, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.025-1.945, P = 0.035), genus Akkermansia (OR = 1.449, 95% CI: 1.120-1.875, P = 0.005), genus Coprococcus 1 (OR = 1.328, 95% CI: 1.066-1.793, P = 0.015), genus Marvinbryantia (OR = 1.353, 95% CI: 1.037-1.777, P = 0.030) and genus Parasutterella (OR = 1.276, 95% CI: 1.022-1.593, P = 0.032) were risk factors for DN. Reversely, genus Eubacterium ventriosum (OR = 0.756, 95% CI: 0.594-0.963, P = 0.023), genus Ruminococcus gauvreauii (OR = 0.663, 95% CI: 0.506-0.870, P = 0.003) and genus Erysipelotrichaceae (UCG003) (OR = 0.801, 95% CI: 0.644-0.997, P = 0.047) were negatively associated with the risk of DN. Among these taxa, genus Ruminococcus gauvreauii played a crucial role in DN. No significant heterogeneity or pleiotropy in the MR result was found. Mapped genes (FDR < 0.05) related to GM had causal effects on DN, while FCGR2B and VNN2 might be potential therapeutic targets.

conclusionsThis work provided new evidence for the causal effect of GM on DN occurrence and potential biomarkers for DN. The significant bacterial taxa in our study provided new insights for the 'gut-kidney' axis, as well as unconventional prevention and treatment strategies for DN.

Indexed as

CausalityDiabetic nephropathyGut microbiotaMendelian randomization

Identifiers

PMID38658966
PMCPMC11044463
OpenAlexW4395112676

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.