ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025
Efficient storage and regression computation for population-scale genome sequencing studies.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
In the era of big data in human genetics, large-scale biobanks aggregating genetic data from diverse populations have emerged as important for advancing our understanding of human health and disease. However, the computational and storage demands of whole genome sequencing (WGS) studies pose significant challenges, especially for researchers from underfunded institutions or developing countries, creating a disparity in research capabilities. We introduce new approaches that significantly enhance computational efficiency and reduce data storage requirements for WGS studies. By developing algorithms for compressed storage of genetic data, focusing particularly on optimizing the representation of rare variants, and designing regression methods tailored for the scale and complexity of WGS data, we significantly lower computational and storage costs. We integrate our approach into PLINK 2.0. The implementation demonstrates considerable reductions in storage space and computational time without compromising analytical accuracy, as evidenced by the application to the AllofUs project data. We optimized the runtime of an exome-wide association analysis involving 19.4 million variants and the body mass index phenotype of 125,077 individuals, reducing it from 695.35 minutes (approximately 11.5 hours) on a single machine to just 1.57 minutes using 30 GB of memory and 50 threads (or 8.67 minutes with 4 threads). Additionally, we extended this approach to support multi-phenotype analyses. We anticipate that our approach will enable researchers across the globe to unlock the potential of population biobanks, accelerating the pace of discoveries that can improve our understanding of human health and disease.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.