ReviewJournal of oral rehabilitation2025
The challenge of ecological validity in temporomandibular disorders research.
Review in Journal of oral rehabilitation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Dynamic Mechanics and Longitudinal Changes in Temporomandibular Joint Structural Integrity.Journal of oral rehabilitation · 2026Article
- Microprolactinoma (Pituitary Adenoma) as a Cause of Secondary Headache in a Pediatric Patient With Pain and Restricted Mouth Opening: A Case Report.Case reports in dentistry · 2026Article
- The oral immune and inflammatory network under circadian clock control.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Nocturnal Autonomic Nervous System and Jaw Muscle Activities and Ramus Height in Children.Orthodontics & craniofacial research · 2025Observational
- Mechanics- and Behavior-Related Temporomandibular Joint Differences.Journal of dental research · 2024Observational
- Association of autoimmune diseases with the occurrence of osteoarthritis: a gene expression and Mendelian randomization study.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo review the ecological validity of outcomes from current research involving temporomandibular disorders (TMDs), with an emphasis on chronic myofascial pain and the precocious development of degenerative disease of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ). MATERIALS AND
methodsCurrent approaches used to study TMDs in terms of neuromechanics, masticatory muscle behaviours, and the dynamics of the autonomic nervous system (ANS) were assessed for ecological validity in this review. In particular, the available literature was scrutinized regarding the effects of sampling, environmental and psychophysiological constraints and averaging data across biological rhythms.
resultsValidated computer-assisted numerical modelling of the neuromechanics used biological objective functions to accurately predict muscle activation patterns for jaw-loading tasks that were individual-specific. With respect to masticatory muscle behaviour, current findings refute the premise that sustained bruxing and clenching at high jaw-loading magnitudes were associated with painful TMDs such as myofascial pain. Concerning the role of the ANS in TMDs, there remains the need for personalized assessments based on biorhythms, and where the detection of dysregulated physiologic oscillators may inform interventions to relieve pain and restore normal function.
conclusionsFuture human research which focuses on TMD myofascial pain or the precocious development and progression of TMJ degenerative joint disease requires experimental designs with ecological validity that capture objectively measured data which meaningfully reflect circadian and ultradian states.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.