ArticleReproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.)2024
Evaluation of an Updated Gene Panel as a Diagnostic Tool for Both Male and Female Infertility.
Article in Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Current gene panels for female infertility: gaps between evidence and clinical application.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2026Review
- Novel Loss-of-FunctionGenes · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
12 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In recent years, an increasing number of genes associated with male and female infertility have been identified. The genetics of infertility is no longer limited to the analysis of karyotypes or specific genes, and it is now possible to analyse several dozen infertility genes simultaneously. Here, we present the diagnostic activity over the past two years including 140 patients (63 women and 77 men). Targeted sequencing revealed causative variants in 17 patients, representing an overall diagnostic rate of 12.1%, with prevalence rates in females and males of 11% and 13%, respectively. The gene-disease relationship (GDR) was re-evaluated for genes due to the addition of new patients and/or variants in the actual study. Five genes changed categories: two female genes (MEIOB and TBPL2) moved from limited to moderate; two male genes (SOHLH1 and GALNTL5) moved from no evidence to strong and from limited to moderate; and SEPTIN12, which was unable to classify male infertility, was reclassified as limited. Many infertility genes have yet to be identified. With the increasing integration of genetics in reproductive medicine, the scope of intervention extends to include other family members, in addition to individual patients or couples. Genetic counselling consultations and appropriate staffing will need to be established in fertility centres. Trial registration number: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.