Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38664582›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Neuroscience2024

Engram mechanisms of memory linking and identity.

Ali Choucry, Masanori Nomoto, Kaoru Inokuchi

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Neuroscience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
7.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. DNA Methylation in Long-Term Memory.Physiology (Bethesda, Md.) · 2025
    Review
  9. Localist neural plasticity identified by mutual information.Journal of computational neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  10. Multi-region processing during sleep for memory and cognition.Proceedings of the Japan Academy. Series B, Physical and biological sciences · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Memory engram stability and flexibility.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Ali ChoucryGraduate School of Medicine and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4091-0661
Masanori NomotoGraduate School of Medicine and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0301-6924
Kaoru InokuchiGraduate School of Medicine and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan. inokuchi@med.u-toyama.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5393-3133
Cairo University · EGJapan Agency for Medical Research and Development · JPUniversity of Toyama · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Memories are thought to be stored in neuronal ensembles referred to as engrams. Studies have suggested that when two memories occur in quick succession, a proportion of their engrams overlap and the memories become linked (in a process known as prospective linking) while maintaining their individual identities. In this Review, we summarize the key principles of memory linking through engram overlap, as revealed by experimental and modelling studies. We describe evidence of the involvement of synaptic memory substrates, spine clustering and non-linear neuronal capacities in prospective linking, and suggest a dynamic somato-synaptic model, in which memories are shared between neurons yet remain separable through distinct dendritic and synaptic allocation patterns. We also bring into focus retrospective linking, in which memories become associated after encoding via offline reactivation, and discuss key temporal and mechanistic differences between prospective and retrospective linking, as well as the potential differences in their cognitive outcomes.

Indexed as

MemoryNeuronsAnimalsBrainHumansModels, NeurologicalSynapses

Identifiers

PMID38664582
OpenAlexW4395447607

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.