Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38670247›Full record

ArticleHeart rhythm2024

Predicting postinfarct ventricular tachycardia by integrating cardiac MRI and advanced computational reentrant pathway analysis.

Pranav Bhagirath, Fernando O Campos, Hassan A Zaidi, Zhong Chen, Mark Elliott, Justin Gould, Michiel J B Kemme, Arthur A M Wilde, Marco J W Götte, Pieter G Postema and 5 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heart rhythm, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Imaging phenotypes and substrates in ventricular tachycardia.Herzschrittmachertherapie & Elektrophysiologie · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. From bits to bedside: entering the age of digital twins in cardiac electrophysiology.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Pranav BhagirathSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom; Department of Cardiology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Electronic address: p.bhagirath@amsterdamumc.nl.
Fernando O CamposSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Hassan A ZaidiSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Zhong ChenDepartment of Cardiology, Royal Brompton & Harefield NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Mark ElliottSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom; Department of Cardiology, St. Thomas' Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Justin GouldSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom; Department of Cardiology, St. Thomas' Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Michiel J B KemmeDepartment of Cardiology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Arthur A M WildeDepartment of Cardiology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Marco J W GötteDepartment of Cardiology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Pieter G PostemaDepartment of Cardiology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Anton J PrasslGottfried Schatz Research Center, Division of Biophysics, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Aurel NeicNumeriCor GmbH, Graz, Austria.
Gernot PlankGottfried Schatz Research Center, Division of Biophysics, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria; NumeriCor GmbH, Graz, Austria.
Christopher A RinaldiDepartment of Cardiology, St. Thomas' Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Martin J BishopSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Amsterdam University Medical Centers · NLKing's College London · GBSt Thomas' Hospital · GBMedical University of Graz · ATRoyal Brompton & Harefield NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

British Heart Foundation PG/18/74/34077British Heart Foundation PG/22/10871British Heart Foundation PG/22/11159Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust WT 203148/Z/16/Z AND 213342/Z/18/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundImplantable cardiac defibrillator (ICD) implantation can protect against sudden cardiac death after myocardial infarction. However, improved risk stratification for device requirement is still needed.

objectiveThe purpose of this study was to improve assessment of postinfarct ventricular electropathology and prediction of appropriate ICD therapy by combining late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) and advanced computational modeling.

methodsADAS 3D LV (ADAS LV Medical, Barcelona, Spain) and custom-made software were used to generate 3-dimensional patient-specific ventricular models in a prospective cohort of patients with a myocardial infarction (N = 40) having undergone LGE imaging before ICD implantation. Corridor metrics and 3-dimensional surface features were computed from LGE images. The Virtual Induction and Treatment of Arrhythmias (VITA) framework was applied to patient-specific models to comprehensively probe the vulnerability of the scar substrate to sustaining reentrant circuits. Imaging and VITA metrics, related to the numbers of induced ventricular tachycardias and their corresponding round trip times (RTTs), were compared with ICD therapy during follow-up.

resultsPatients with an event (n = 17) had a larger interface between healthy myocardium and scar and higher VITA metrics. Cox regression analysis demonstrated a significant independent association with an event: interface (hazard ratio [HR] 2.79; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.44-5.44; P < .01), unique ventricular tachycardias (HR 1.67; 95% CI 1.04-2.68; P = .03), mean RTT (HR 2.14; 95% CI 1.11-4.12; P = .02), and maximum RTT (HR 2.13; 95% CI 1.19-3.81; P = .01).

conclusionA detailed quantitative analysis of LGE-based scar maps, combined with advanced computational modeling, can accurately predict ICD therapy and could facilitate the early identification of high-risk patients in addition to left ventricular ejection fraction.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance Imaging, CineMyocardial InfarctionTachycardia, VentricularAgedDeath, Sudden, CardiacDefibrillators, ImplantableFemaleHeart VentriclesHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRisk AssessmentComputational ModellingICD therapyIschemic cardiomyopathyLate gadolinium enhancementVentricular tachycardia

Identifiers

PMID38670247
PMCPMC11739773
OpenAlexW4395084655

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.