Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38673303›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2024

Barriers and Facilitators of Implementing a Healthy Lifestyle Intervention at Workplaces in South Africa.

Shivneta Singh, Ashika Naicker, Heleen Grobbelaar, Evonne Shanita Singh, Donna Spiegelman, Archana Shrestha

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Shivneta SinghDepartment of Food and Nutrition, Faculty of Applied Sciences, Durban University of Technology, 70 Steve Biko Road, Musgrave, Berea 4001, South Africa.
Ashika NaickerDepartment of Food and Nutrition, Faculty of Applied Sciences, Durban University of Technology, 70 Steve Biko Road, Musgrave, Berea 4001, South Africa.
Heleen GrobbelaarDepartment of Food and Nutrition, Faculty of Applied Sciences, Durban University of Technology, 70 Steve Biko Road, Musgrave, Berea 4001, South Africa.
Evonne Shanita SinghDepartment of Food and Nutrition, Faculty of Applied Sciences, Durban University of Technology, 70 Steve Biko Road, Musgrave, Berea 4001, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-1873-389X
Donna SpiegelmanDepartment of Chronic Disease Epidemiology, Center of Methods for Implementation and Prevention Science, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT 06510, USA.
Archana ShresthaDepartment of Chronic Disease Epidemiology, Center of Methods for Implementation and Prevention Science, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT 06510, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Current evidence indicates that workplace health and wellness programmes provide numerous benefits concerning altering cardiovascular risk factor profiles. Implementing health programmes at workplaces provide an opportunity to engage adults towards positive and sustainable lifestyle choices. The first step in designing lifestyle interventions for the workplace is understanding the barriers and facilitators to implementing interventions in these settings. The barriers and facilitators to implementing lifestyle interventions in the workplace environment was qualitatively explored at two multinational consumer goods companies among seven workplaces in South Africa. Semi-structured in-depth interviews (IDIs) were conducted with ten workplace managers. Five focus group discussions (FGDs) were conducted among workplace employees. The IDI findings revealed that the main facilitators for participation in a lifestyle intervention programme were incentives and rewards, educational tools, workplace support, and engaging lessons. In contrast, the main facilitator of the FGDs was health and longevity. The main barriers from the IDIs included scheduling time for lifestyle interventions within production schedules at manufacturing sites, whereas time limitations, a lack of willpower and self-discipline were the main barriers identified from the FGDs. The findings of this study add to literature on the barriers and facilitators of implementing healthy lifestyle interventions at workplaces and suggest that there is a potential for successfully implementing intervention programmes to improve health outcomes, provided that such efforts are informed and guided through the engagement of workplace stakeholders, an assessment of the physical and food environment, and the availability of workplace resources.

Indexed as

Focus GroupsHealth PromotionHealthy LifestyleWorkplaceAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOccupational HealthSouth Africabarriersfacilitatorsimplementationintervention programmesworkplace

Identifiers

PMID38673303
PMCPMC11050208

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.