Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38674458›Full record

ArticleGenes2024

Dissecting Selective Signatures and Candidate Genes in Grandparent Lines Subject to High Selection Pressure for Broiler Production and in a Local Russian Chicken Breed of Ushanka.

Michael N Romanov, Alexey V Shakhin, Alexandra S Abdelmanova, Natalia A Volkova, Dmitry N Efimov, Vladimir I Fisinin, Liudmila G Korshunova, Dmitry V Anshakov, Arsen V Dotsev, Darren K Griffin and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genes, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Genome-Wide Association Studies in Japanese Quails of the FInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Michael N RomanovL. K. Ernst Federal Research Center for Animal Husbandry, Dubrovitsy, Podolsk 142132, Moscow Oblast, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-3584-4644
Alexey V ShakhinL. K. Ernst Federal Research Center for Animal Husbandry, Dubrovitsy, Podolsk 142132, Moscow Oblast, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-4959-878X
Alexandra S AbdelmanovaL. K. Ernst Federal Research Center for Animal Husbandry, Dubrovitsy, Podolsk 142132, Moscow Oblast, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-4752-0727
Natalia A VolkovaL. K. Ernst Federal Research Center for Animal Husbandry, Dubrovitsy, Podolsk 142132, Moscow Oblast, Russia.ORCID 0000-0001-7191-3550
Dmitry N EfimovFederal State Budget Scientific Institution Federal Scientific Center "All-Russian Research and Technological Poultry Institute", Sergiev Posad 141311, Moscow Oblast, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-4152-2476
Vladimir I FisininFederal State Budget Scientific Institution Federal Scientific Center "All-Russian Research and Technological Poultry Institute", Sergiev Posad 141311, Moscow Oblast, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-0081-6336
Liudmila G KorshunovaFederal State Budget Scientific Institution Federal Scientific Center "All-Russian Research and Technological Poultry Institute", Sergiev Posad 141311, Moscow Oblast, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-4393-7499
Dmitry V AnshakovBreeding and Genetic Center "Zagorsk Experimental Breeding Farm"-Branch of the Federal Research Center "All-Russian Poultry Research and Technological Institute", Russian Academy of Sciences, Sergiev Posad 141311, Moscow Oblast, Russia.ORCID 0000-0001-5542-0828
Arsen V DotsevL. K. Ernst Federal Research Center for Animal Husbandry, Dubrovitsy, Podolsk 142132, Moscow Oblast, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-3418-2511
Darren K GriffinSchool of Biosciences, University of Kent, Canterbury CT2 7NJ, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7595-3226
Natalia A ZinovievaL. K. Ernst Federal Research Center for Animal Husbandry, Dubrovitsy, Podolsk 142132, Moscow Oblast, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-4017-6863
Federal Scientific Center for Animal Husbandry named after Academician L.K. Ernst · RUAll-Russian Scientific Research and Technological Institute of Poultry Russian Academy of Agricultural Sciences · RUUniversity of Kent · GB

Funding

Russian Ministry of Science and Higher Education N/ARussian Science Foundation 21-66-00007
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breeding improvements and quantitative trait genetics are essential to the advancement of broiler production. The impact of artificial selection on genomic architecture and the genetic markers sought remains a key area of research. Here, we used whole-genome resequencing data to analyze the genomic architecture, diversity, and selective sweeps in Cornish White (CRW) and Plymouth Rock White (PRW) transboundary breeds selected for meat production and, comparatively, in an aboriginal Russian breed of Ushanka (USH). Reads were aligned to the reference genome bGalGal1.mat.broiler.GRCg7b and filtered to remove PCR duplicates and low-quality reads using BWA-MEM2 and bcftools software; 12,563,892 SNPs were produced for subsequent analyses. Compared to CRW and PRW, USH had a lower diversity and a higher genetic distinctiveness. Selective sweep regions and corresponding candidate genes were examined based on Z

Indexed as

ChickensPolymorphism, Single NucleotideSelection, GeneticAnimalsBreedingQuantitative Trait LociRussiaWhole Genome Sequencingbroiler productioncandidate geneschickengenetic diversitygenomic regionsPlymouth Rock White breedselection signaturesSNPsUshanka breedWhite Cornish breed

Identifiers

PMID38674458
PMCPMC11050503
OpenAlexW4394998676

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.