ReviewMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Advanced Nano-Drug Delivery Systems in the Treatment of Ischemic Stroke.
Review in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- SRT1720-loaded exosome-mimetic nanovesicles promote mitophagy via SIRT1/PARKIN activation to ameliorate diabetic cerebral infarction in a preclinical rat model.International journal of pharmaceutics: X · 2026Article
- Nanomaterial-Based Drug Delivery Systems for Ischemic Stroke: From Blood-Brain Barrier Crossing to Neuroprotection.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
- Anticoagulation strategies for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: a comprehensive review of current literature.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2025Review
- The role of nanomaterials in revolutionizing ischemic stroke treatment: Current trends and future prospects.iScience · 2024Review
- Targeted pathophysiological treatment of ischemic stroke using nanoparticle-based drug delivery system.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2024Review
- Microenvironment-responsive nanosystems for ischemic stroke therapy.Theranostics · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
In recent years, the frequency of strokes has been on the rise year by year and has become the second leading cause of death around the world, which is characterized by a high mortality rate, high recurrence rate, and high disability rate. Ischemic strokes account for a large percentage of strokes. A reperfusion injury in ischemic strokes is a complex cascade of oxidative stress, neuroinflammation, immune infiltration, and mitochondrial damage. Conventional treatments are ineffective, and the presence of the blood-brain barrier (BBB) leads to inefficient drug delivery utilization, so researchers are turning their attention to nano-drug delivery systems. Functionalized nano-drug delivery systems have been widely studied and applied to the study of cerebral ischemic diseases due to their favorable biocompatibility, high efficiency, strong specificity, and specific targeting ability. In this paper, we briefly describe the pathological process of reperfusion injuries in strokes and focus on the therapeutic research progress of nano-drug delivery systems in ischemic strokes, aiming to provide certain references to understand the progress of research on nano-drug delivery systems (NDDSs).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.