Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38678271›Full record

ReviewJournal of nanobiotechnology2024

Electrospun nanofibers synthesized from polymers incorporated with bioactive compounds for wound healing.

Naveen Palani, Pradeshwaran Vijayakumar, P Monisha, Saravanakumar Ayyadurai, Suriyaprakash Rajadesingu

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of nanobiotechnology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
12.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Adoption of polyvinyl alcohol electrospinning materials for skin wound dressing.Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Naveen PalaniDepartment of Physics and Nanotechnology, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Chengalpattu District, Kattankulathur, 603 203, Tamil Nadu, India.
Pradeshwaran VijayakumarDepartment of Chemistry, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Chengalpattu District, Kattankulathur, 603 203, Tamil Nadu, India.
P MonishaPG & Research Department of Physics, Sri Sarada College for Women, Salem, 636 016, Tamil Nadu, India.
Saravanakumar AyyaduraiCentre for Research in Environment, Sustainability Advocacy and Climate CHange (REACH), Directorate of Research, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Chengalpattu District, Kattankulathur, 603 203, Tamil Nadu, India.
Suriyaprakash RajadesinguCentre for Research in Environment, Sustainability Advocacy and Climate CHange (REACH), Directorate of Research, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Chengalpattu District, Kattankulathur, 603 203, Tamil Nadu, India. surya.biotech2020@gmail.com.
SRM Institute of Science and Technology · INASA College · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of innovative wound dressing materials is crucial for effective wound care. It's an active area of research driven by a better understanding of chronic wound pathogenesis. Addressing wound care properly is a clinical challenge, but there is a growing demand for advancements in this field. The synergy of medicinal plants and nanotechnology offers a promising approach to expedite the healing process for both acute and chronic wounds by facilitating the appropriate progression through various healing phases. Metal nanoparticles play an increasingly pivotal role in promoting efficient wound healing and preventing secondary bacterial infections. Their small size and high surface area facilitate enhanced biological interaction and penetration at the wound site. Specifically designed for topical drug delivery, these nanoparticles enable the sustained release of therapeutic molecules, such as growth factors and antibiotics. This targeted approach ensures optimal cell-to-cell interactions, proliferation, and vascularization, fostering effective and controlled wound healing. Nanoscale scaffolds have significant attention due to their attractive properties, including delivery capacity, high porosity and high surface area. They mimic the Extracellular matrix (ECM) and hence biocompatible. In response to the alarming rise of antibiotic-resistant, biohybrid nanofibrous wound dressings are gradually replacing conventional antibiotic delivery systems. This emerging class of wound dressings comprises biopolymeric nanofibers with inherent antibacterial properties, nature-derived compounds, and biofunctional agents. Nanotechnology, diminutive nanomaterials, nanoscaffolds, nanofibers, and biomaterials are harnessed for targeted drug delivery aimed at wound healing. This review article discusses the effects of nanofibrous scaffolds loaded with nanoparticles on wound healing, including biological (in vivo and in vitro) and mechanical outcomes.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsBandagesNanofibersPolymersWound HealingAnimalsBiocompatible MaterialsDrug Delivery SystemsHumansMetal NanoparticlesAnti-Bacterial AgentsBiocompatible MaterialsPolymersAntibacterialElectrospiningNanofibrous matsNanomaterialWound dressing

Identifiers

PMID38678271
PMCPMC11056076
OpenAlexW4395701351

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.